Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy with Grass Monomeric Allergoid: Comparison Between Two Different Treatment Regimens
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with monomeric carbamylated allergoid proved to be well tolerated, safe and effective in patients with respiratory allergy. Standard administration regimens are expected to require a long time before clinical benefit can be appreciated. We investigated whether pre-seasonal and perennial regimens differently affect the clinical efficacy of grass pollen SLIT.
Methods: Adult patients with allergic rhino-conjunctivitis with/without mild intermittent asthma due to grass pollen were included into this open prospective study and randomised to receive SLIT with a continuous regimen (Group 1: 1,000 AU/week for the entire study period) or a pre-seasonal regimen (Group 2: 5,000 AU/week for 10 weeks/year for 2 years), or on demand drug therapy alone (Group 3) for two years. At entry (November 2005), at the end of the first and second pollen season, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess patients' well-being. Symptom score and drug consumption were evaluated during the seasons. Methacholine challenge was performed at study entry and conclusion. Adverse events were recorded along the whole study duration.
Results: Thirty-two patients were divided into Group 1 (n = 10), Group 2 (n = 11) and Group 3 (n = 11). A significant VAS improvement was observed in both SLIT groups, after the first and second pollen season, compared to baseline and to Group 3 (p < 0.05). Less symptoms and need for medications resulted during the second season (p < 0.05). No relevant variations in bronchial hyper-reactivity have been observed between the three groups. Only 2 patients experienced local or mild reactions in SLIT groups.
Conclusion: Both pre-seasonal and continuous regimen of SLIT with monomeric allergoid turned out effective and safe, suggesting that a pre-seasonal course with 5,000 AU/week for 10 weeks may represent a convenient option in patients with grass pollen allergic rhinitis with/without mild intermittent asthma. Further research is urgently needed to consolidate these preliminary evidences.
Clinical Practice Guideline: Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergy.
Gurgel R, Baroody F, Damask C, Mims J, Ishman S, Baker Jr D Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 170 Suppl 1:S1-S42.
PMID: 38408152 PMC: 11788925. DOI: 10.1002/ohn.648.
Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.
Fortescue R, Kew K, Leung M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 9:CD011293.
PMID: 32926419 PMC: 8094418. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011293.pub3.
Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.
Normansell R, Kew K, Bridgman A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (8):CD011293.
PMID: 26315994 PMC: 6769158. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011293.pub2.
Demoly P, Calderon M, Casale T, Malling H, Wahn U Clin Transl Allergy. 2015; 5:18.
PMID: 25941566 PMC: 4418040. DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0061-z.
Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update.
Canonica G, Cox L, Pawankar R, Baena-Cagnani C, Blaiss M, Bonini S World Allergy Organ J. 2014; 7(1):6.
PMID: 24679069 PMC: 3983904. DOI: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-6.