» Articles » PMID: 22354837

Mass Spectrometry-based Quantification of CYP Enzymes to Establish in Vitro/in Vivo Scaling Factors for Intestinal and Hepatic Metabolism in Beagle Dog

Overview
Journal Pharm Res
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2012 Feb 23
PMID 22354837
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Physiologically based models, when verified in pre-clinical species, optimally predict human pharmacokinetics. However, modeling of intestinal metabolism has been a gap. To establish in vitro/in vivo scaling factors for metabolism, the expression and activity of CYP enzymes were characterized in the intestine and liver of beagle dog.

Methods: Microsomal protein abundance in dog tissues was determined using testosterone-6β-hydroxylation and 7-hydroxycoumarin-glucuronidation as markers for microsomal protein recovery. Expressions of 7 CYP enzymes were estimated based on quantification of proteotypic tryptic peptides using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. CYP3A12 and CYP2B11 activity was evaluated using selective marker reactions.

Results: The geometric mean of total microsomal protein was 51 mg/g in liver and 13 mg/cm in intestine, without significant differences between intestinal segments. CYP3A12, followed by CYP2B11, were the most abundant CYP enzymes in intestine. Abundance and activity were higher in liver than intestine and declined from small intestine to colon.

Conclusions: CYP expression in dog liver and intestine was characterized, providing a basis for in vitro/in vivo scaling of intestinal and hepatic metabolism.

Citing Articles

Assessment of cytochrome P450 induction in canine intestinal organoid models.

Nagao I, Nakazawa M, Goyama T, Court M, Ambrosini Y Xenobiotica. 2024; 54(5):217-225.

PMID: 38441495 PMC: 11178462. DOI: 10.1080/00498254.2024.2326973.


Interlaboratory Variability in the Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cell Proteome.

Harwood M, Zettl K, Weinheimer M, Pilla-Reddy V, Shen H, Jacobs F Mol Pharm. 2023; 20(7):3505-3518.

PMID: 37283406 PMC: 10324398. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00108.


Comparison of Canine and Human Physiological Factors: Understanding Interspecies Differences that Impact Drug Pharmacokinetics.

Martinez M, Mochel J, Neuhoff S, Pade D AAPS J. 2021; 23(3):59.

PMID: 33907906 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00590-0.


Parameterization of Microsomal and Cytosolic Scaling Factors: Methodological and Biological Considerations for Scalar Derivation and Validation.

Doerksen M, Jones R, Coughtrie M, Collier A Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2020; 46(2):173-183.

PMID: 33340340 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-020-00666-w.


Absolute Quantitation of Drug-Metabolizing Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Accessory Proteins in Dog Liver Microsomes Using Label-Free Standard-Free Analysis Reveals Interbreed Variability.

Martinez S, Shi J, Zhu H, Perez Jimenez T, Zhu Z, Court M Drug Metab Dispos. 2019; 47(11):1314-1324.

PMID: 31427433 PMC: 6800445. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.088070.


References
1.
Gertz M, Davis J, Harrison A, Houston J, Galetin A . Grapefruit juice-drug interaction studies as a method to assess the extent of intestinal availability: utility and limitations. Curr Drug Metab. 2008; 9(8):785-95. DOI: 10.2174/138920008786049276. View

2.
Gertz M, Harrison A, Houston J, Galetin A . Prediction of human intestinal first-pass metabolism of 25 CYP3A substrates from in vitro clearance and permeability data. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010; 38(7):1147-58. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.110.032649. View

3.
Omura T, Sato R . THE CARBON MONOXIDE-BINDING PIGMENT OF LIVER MICROSOMES. I. EVIDENCE FOR ITS HEMOPROTEIN NATURE. J Biol Chem. 1964; 239:2370-8. View

4.
Agger S, Marney L, Hoofnagle A . Simultaneous quantification of apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein B by liquid-chromatography-multiple- reaction-monitoring mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(12):1804-13. PMC: 3103773. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.152264. View

5.
Jones H, Parrott N, Ohlenbusch G, Lave T . Predicting pharmacokinetic food effects using biorelevant solubility media and physiologically based modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006; 45(12):1213-26. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200645120-00006. View