» Articles » PMID: 22354154

Predictors of Successful Decannulation Using a Tracheostomy Retainer in Patients with Prolonged Weaning and Persisting Respiratory Failure

Overview
Journal Respiration
Publisher Karger
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2012 Feb 23
PMID 22354154
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For percutaneously tracheostomized patients with prolonged weaning and persisting respiratory failure, the adequate time point for safe decannulation and switch to noninvasive ventilation is an important clinical issue.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a tracheostomy retainer (TR) and the predictors of successful decannulation.

Methods: We studied 166 of 384 patients with prolonged weaning in whom a TR was inserted into a tracheostoma. Patients were analyzed with regard to successful decannulation and characterized by blood gas values, the duration of previous spontaneous breathing, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) and laboratory parameters.

Results: In 47 patients (28.3%) recannulation was necessary, mostly due to respiratory decompensation and aspiration. Overall, 80.6% of the patients could be liberated from a tracheostomy with the help of a TR. The need for recannulation was associated with a shorter duration of spontaneous breathing within the last 24/48 h (p < 0.01 each), lower arterial oxygen tension (p = 0.025), greater age (p = 0.025), and a higher creatinine level (p = 0.003) and SAPS (p < 0.001). The risk for recannulation was 9.5% when patients breathed spontaneously for 19-24 h within the 24 h prior to decannulation, but 75.0% when patients breathed for only 0-6 h without ventilatory support (p < 0.001). According to ROC analysis, the SAPS best predicted successful decannulation [AUC 0.725 (95% CI: 0.634-0.815), p < 0.001]. Recannulated patients had longer durations of intubation (p = 0.046), tracheostomy (p = 0.003) and hospital stay (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In percutaneously tracheostomized patients with prolonged weaning, the use of a TR seems to facilitate and improve the weaning process considerably. The duration of spontaneous breathing prior to decannulation, age and oxygenation describe the risk for recannulation in these patients.

Citing Articles

[Clinical-demographic characteristics of tracheostomized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Carnero Echegaray J, Larocca F, Bellon P, Bosso M Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2024; 81(3):477-490.

PMID: 39352851 PMC: 11536816. DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v81.n3.43477.


Standardized Endoscopic Swallowing Evaluation for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients - a prospective evaluation.

Muhle P, Suntrup-Krueger S, Burkardt K, Lapa S, Ogawa M, Claus I Neurol Res Pract. 2021; 3(1):26.

PMID: 33966636 PMC: 8108459. DOI: 10.1186/s42466-021-00124-1.


Prediction of successful de-cannulation of tracheostomised patients in medical intensive care units.

Park C, Ko R, Jung J, Na S, Jeon K Respir Res. 2021; 22(1):131.

PMID: 33910566 PMC: 8080087. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-021-01732-w.


Guidelines for Tracheostomy From the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society.

Nam I, Shin Y, Jeong W, Park M, Park S, Song C Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 13(4):361-375.

PMID: 32717774 PMC: 7669309. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2020.00353.


Use of a Silicon Stoma Stent as an Interim Step in High-Risk Tracheostomy Decannulation.

Ross J, McMurray K, Cameron T, Lanteri C OTO Open. 2019; 3(1):2473974X19836432.

PMID: 31236540 PMC: 6572920. DOI: 10.1177/2473974X19836432.