» Articles » PMID: 22351259

Comparative Performance of Flat Sheet and Spiral Wound Modules in the Nanofiltration of Reactive Dye Solution

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Feb 22
PMID 22351259
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Besides the opportunities for reuse, stringent regulations and growing public awareness demand an enhanced quality of effluent from dye industries. Treatment of an aqueous solution of dye (reactive red 198) was carried out in a nanofiltration unit using both flat sheet and spiral wound modules to obtain a comparative performance evaluation in terms of permeate flux and quality.

Methods: Hydrophilized polyamide membrane with molecular weight cutoff of 150 was used for the experiments. Effects of trans-membrane pressure (TMP), feed concentration and addition of salt on permeate flux were investigated. Percent reduction of color, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solid (TDS), and conductivity were determined to assess performance of the membrane.

Results: The maximum flux decline was 16.1% of its initial value at 490 kPa TMP with 50 ppm feed concentration in spiral wound module, whereas the same in flat sheet under same conditions was 7.2%. The effect of TMP showed a quasi-linear increase in flux with increasing pressure. Increased permeate concentration led to the reduction in observed retention of dye in the membrane. The average reduction in color, COD, and TDS were 96.88%, 97.38%, and 89.24%, respectively. The decline in permeate flux was more in case of spiral wound module compared to flat sheet. However, spiral wound module performed better in terms of color removal, COD reduction, and TDS removal.

Conclusion: Substantial removal of color was achieved in the nanofiltration experiments with a marked reduction in COD and TDS. The process allowed the production of permeate stream with great reutilization possibilities.

References
1.
Golka K, Kopps S, Myslak Z . Carcinogenicity of azo colorants: influence of solubility and bioavailability. Toxicol Lett. 2004; 151(1):203-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.11.016. View

2.
Levine W . Metabolism of azo dyes: implication for detoxication and activation. Drug Metab Rev. 1991; 23(3-4):253-309. DOI: 10.3109/03602539109029761. View

3.
Dotto G, Pinto L . Adsorption of food dyes acid blue 9 and food yellow 3 onto chitosan: stirring rate effect in kinetics and mechanism. J Hazard Mater. 2011; 187(1-3):164-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.016. View

4.
Koyuncu I, Topacik D, Wiesner M . Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts. Water Res. 2003; 38(2):432-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.001. View

5.
Lee H, Amy G, Cho J, Yoon Y, Moon S, Kim I . Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter. Water Res. 2001; 35(14):3301-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00063-x. View