» Articles » PMID: 22348224

Survey of the Differences Between Regenerative and Non-regenerative Animals

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 22
PMID 22348224
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate the boundaries between regenerative and non-regenerative animals, we first survey regenerative ability across animal phyla from sponges to chordates (including mammals). There are both regenerative and non-regenerative animals in each phylum. The cells participating in regeneration also vary among different species. Thus, it is hard to find clear rules concerning regeneration ability across the animal kingdom, suggesting that it is not useful to compare the difference of regenerative ability across phyla to seek the boundary between regenerative and non-regenerative animals. Instead, if we carefully compare the differences of regenerative ability between closely related species within each phylum and accumulate these differences at the cellular molecular levels, we may be able to clarify the boundary between regenerative and non-regenerative animals. Here we introduce our comparative analysis of cellular events after amputation of lower jaws between frogs and newts. Then we propose that such comparative analyses using closely related species within the same phylum should be accumulated to understand the boundary between regenerative and non-regenerative animals in order to apply this understanding for realizing regenerative medicine in the future.

Citing Articles

Post-Myocardial Infarction Remodeling and Hyperkinetic Remote Myocardium in Sheep Measured by Cardiac MRI Feature Tracking.

Cho S, Darby J, Williams G, Holman S, Rai A, van Amerom J J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 61(3):1323-1335.

PMID: 38940396 PMC: 11803690. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29496.


Morphological and Molecular Changes during Limb Regeneration of the .

Xing C, Wang M, Chen Z, Li Y, Zhou X, Wang L Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38473070 PMC: 10931334. DOI: 10.3390/ani14050685.


FGF-stimulated tendon cells embrace a chondrogenic fate with BMP7 in newt tissue culture.

Sugiura N, Agata K Dev Growth Differ. 2024; 66(3):182-193.

PMID: 38342985 PMC: 11457504. DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12913.


Ancestral Stem Cell Reprogramming Genes Active in Hemichordate Regeneration.

Humphreys T, Weiser K, Arimoto A, Sasaki A, Uenishi G, Fujimoto B Front Ecol Evol. 2023; 10.

PMID: 37008716 PMC: 10065570. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.769433.


Genes and miRNAs as Hurdles and Promoters of Corticospinal Tract Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury.

Boido M, Vercelli A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:748911.

PMID: 34722529 PMC: 8554128. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.748911.