» Articles » PMID: 22345484

Visual Landmarks Facilitate Rodent Spatial Navigation in Virtual Reality Environments

Overview
Journal Learn Mem
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Feb 21
PMID 22345484
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because many different sensory modalities contribute to spatial learning in rodents, it has been difficult to determine whether spatial navigation can be guided solely by visual cues. Rodents moving within physical environments with visual cues engage a variety of nonvisual sensory systems that cannot be easily inhibited without lesioning brain areas. Virtual reality offers a unique approach to ask whether visual landmark cues alone are sufficient to improve performance in a spatial task. We found that mice could learn to navigate between two water reward locations along a virtual bidirectional linear track using a spherical treadmill. Mice exposed to a virtual environment with vivid visual cues rendered on a single monitor increased their performance over a 3-d training regimen. Training significantly increased the percentage of time avatars controlled by the mice spent near reward locations in probe trials without water rewards. Neither improvement during training or spatial learning for reward locations occurred with mice operating a virtual environment without vivid landmarks or with mice deprived of all visual feedback. Mice operating the vivid environment developed stereotyped avatar turning behaviors when alternating between reward zones that were positively correlated with their performance on the probe trial. These results suggest that mice are able to learn to navigate to specific locations using only visual cues presented within a virtual environment rendered on a single computer monitor.

Citing Articles

Shortcutting from self-motion signals reveals a cognitive map in mice.

Xu J, Girardi-Schappo M, Beique J, Longtin A, Maler L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39526583 PMC: 11554306. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.95764.


Hippocampal sequences span experience relative to rewards.

Sosa M, Plitt M, Giocomo L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38234842 PMC: 10793396. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.27.573490.


Vestibular cues improve landmark-based route navigation: A simulated driving study.

Jabbari Y, Kenney D, von Mohrenschildt M, Shedden J Mem Cognit. 2021; 49(8):1633-1644.

PMID: 34018119 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01181-2.


Mouse entorhinal cortex encodes a diverse repertoire of self-motion signals.

Mallory C, Hardcastle K, Campbell M, Attinger A, Low I, Raymond J Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):671.

PMID: 33510164 PMC: 7844029. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-20936-8.


Goal-directed interaction of stimulus and task demand in the parahippocampal region.

Lee S, Jin S, Park S, Park E, Lee C, Lee H Hippocampus. 2021; 31(7):717-736.

PMID: 33394547 PMC: 8359334. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23295.


References
1.
Wood E, Dudchenko P, Eichenbaum H . The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature. 1999; 397(6720):613-6. DOI: 10.1038/17605. View

2.
Brown M, Yang S, Digian K . No evidence for overshadowing or facilitation of spatial pattern learning by visual cues. Anim Learn Behav. 2003; 30(4):363-75. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195961. View

3.
Knierim J, Kudrimoti H, McNaughton B . Interactions between idiothetic cues and external landmarks in the control of place cells and head direction cells. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(1):425-46. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.425. View

4.
Harvey C, Collman F, Dombeck D, Tank D . Intracellular dynamics of hippocampal place cells during virtual navigation. Nature. 2009; 461(7266):941-6. PMC: 2771429. DOI: 10.1038/nature08499. View

5.
Morris R . Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1984; 11(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4. View