» Articles » PMID: 22342529

Left Atrial Appendage Emptying Fraction Assessed by a Feature-tracking Echocardiographic Method is a Determinant of Thrombus in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal J Cardiol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2012 Feb 21
PMID 22342529
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus increases the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), and LAA contractile function like emptying fraction (EF) should have physiological importance in thrombus formation. The aim of this study was to validate a velocity vector imaging (VVI) method for quantification of the LAA function and to elucidate echocardiographic parameters that are related to the presence of LAA thrombus in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Methods: We measured left atrial (LA) dimension and LAEF by VVI using transthoracic echocardiography, and LAA emptying velocity, spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), and LAAEF by VVI using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in 142 consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (n=38) or absence (n=104) of LAA thrombus.

Results: There was a good correlation between the VVI method and manual-tracing method for LAAEF and LAEF of patients with AF (r=0.97, r=0.96, respectively, p<0.001). LAAEF in AF with thrombus was significantly reduced compared with AF without thrombus (16.9±3.1% and 29.0±9.7%, p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LAAEF, SEC, and prior stroke were independent determinants of LAA thrombus. Using 20% of LAAEF as a cutoff value, the sensitivity was 92% and specificity was 88% for LAA thrombus.

Conclusion: The VVI method was reliable in the measurement of LAAEF and LAEF compared with the manual-tracing method. LAAEF assessed by the VVI method using TEE was related to the presence of LAA thrombus.

Citing Articles

Left atrial appendage velocity, association with inflammatory indices in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients.

Khesali H, Ghaffari Jolfayi A, Soheili A, Rezapour P, Adimi S, Alirezaei T Future Cardiol. 2025; 21(2):103-111.

PMID: 39874020 PMC: 11812346. DOI: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2458414.


Morphological and functional assessment of the left atrial appendage in daily practice: a comprehensive approach using basic and advanced echocardiography with practical tips.

Anwar A J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 32(1):12.

PMID: 39069633 PMC: 11285475. DOI: 10.1186/s44348-024-00017-2.


Left atrial appendage angiography for stroke risk prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Jiang L, Hao Z, Xie X, Xu K, Shen L, Pan X EuroIntervention. 2023; 19(8):695-702.

PMID: 37594402 PMC: 10591194. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00325.


Finding low CHA2DS2-VASc scores unreliable? Why not give morphological and hemodynamic methods a try?.

Sun Y, Ling Y, Chen Z, Wang Z, Li T, Tong Q Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 9:1032736.

PMID: 36684565 PMC: 9846026. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1032736.


Stroke risk evaluation for patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from left atrial appendage.

Fang R, Li Y, Wang J, Wang Z, Allen J, Ching C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:968630.

PMID: 36072865 PMC: 9441763. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.968630.