» Articles » PMID: 22341718

Pain and Anxiety During Bone Marrow Aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of Ratings Among Patients Versus Health-care Professionals

Overview
Specialties Nursing
Oncology
Date 2012 Feb 21
PMID 22341718
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy (BMA) among patients versus health-care professionals (HCPs).

Method: 235 adult hematologic patients undergoing BMA were included. BMA was performed by 16 physicians aided by nine registered nurses (RNs). Questionnaires were used to obtain patients and HCPs ratings of patients' pain and anxiety during BMA. Patterns of ratings for pain and anxiety among patients HCPs were estimated with proportions of agreement P(A), Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), and single-measure intra-class correlation (ICC). We also explored if associations of ratings were influenced by age, sex, type and duration of BMA.

Results: The P(A) for occurrence of rated pain during BMA was 73% between patients and RNs, and 70% between patients and physicians, the corresponding κ was graded as fair (0.37 and 0.33). Agreement between patients and HCPs regarding intensity of pain was moderate (ICC=0.44 and 0.42). Severe pain (VAS>54) was identified by RNs and physicians in 34% and 35% of cases, respectively. Anxiety about BMA outcome and needle insertion was underestimated by HCPs. P(A) between patients and RNs and patients and physicians regarding anxiety ranged from 53% to 59%. The corresponding κ was slight to fair (0.10-0.21). ICC showed poor agreement between patients and HCPs regarding intensity of anxiety (0.13-0.36).

Conclusions: We found a better congruence between patients and HCPs in pain ratings than in anxiety ratings, where the agreement was low. RNs and physicians underestimated severe pain as well as anxiety about BMA outcome and needle insertion.

Citing Articles

Simulation-based Bone Marrow Aspiration and Trephine Biopsy Education for Medical Students: A Non-randomized Controlled Trial.

Yamamoto A, Nishimori H, Seike K, Fujiwara H, Asada N, Ennishi D Intern Med. 2024; 64(4):527-533.

PMID: 39019605 PMC: 11904458. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3998-24.


Serum Erythropoietin level in anemia of elderly with unclear etiology.

Seong J, Shin D, Byun J, Koh Y, Hong J, Kim I Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15902.

PMID: 37741889 PMC: 10517950. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42806-7.


This Is Going to Hurt: Revisiting the Patient Experience of Bone Marrow Biopsies.

Hibbs S Hemasphere. 2022; 6(4):e710.

PMID: 35402851 PMC: 8984577. DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000710.


Palliative care during and following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Mitchell S Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018; 12(1):58-64.

PMID: 29303840 PMC: 5803752. DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000327.


Bone marrow aspirations in oncological patients: experience from an in-house standard in paediatrics.

Sauer H, Graeber S, Lieser U, Foell J Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017; 169(3-4):82-86.

PMID: 29196827 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-017-0611-1.


References
1.
Radwin L . 'Knowing the patient': a review of research on an emerging concept. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 23(6):1142-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.12910.x. View

2.
Mollema E, Snoek F, Heine R, VAN DER Ploeg H . Phobia of self-injecting and self-testing in insulin-treated diabetes patients: opportunities for screening. Diabet Med. 2001; 18(8):671-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00547.x. View

3.
Kruijver I, Garssen B, Visser A, Kuiper A . Signalising psychosocial problems in cancer care :the structural use of a short psychosocial checklist during medical or nursing visits. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 62(2):163-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.001. View

4.
Gollop S . Pain: a summary. Nursing (Lond). 1986; 3(10):382-3. View

5.
Steedman B, Watson J, Ali S, Shields M, Patmore R, Allsup D . Inhaled nitrous oxide (Entonox) as a short acting sedative during bone marrow examination. Clin Lab Haematol. 2006; 28(5):321-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00807.x. View