The Cost-effectiveness of Routine Tuberculosis Screening with Xpert MTB/RIF Prior to Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: a Model-based Analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In settings with high tuberculosis (TB) prevalence, 15-30% of HIV-infected individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) have undiagnosed TB. Such patients are usually screened by symptoms and sputum smear, which have poor sensitivity.
Objective: To project the clinical and economic outcomes of using Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert), a rapid TB/rifampicin-resistance diagnostic, to screen individuals initiating ART.
Design: We used a microsimulation model to evaluate the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative TB screening modalities - in all patients or only symptomatic patients - for hypothetical cohorts of individuals initiating ART in South Africa (mean CD4 cell count = 171 cells/μl; TB prevalence 22%). We simulated no active screening and four diagnostic strategies, smear microscopy (sensitivity 23%); smear and culture (sensitivity, 100%); one Xpert sample (sensitivity in smear-negative TB: 43%); two Xpert samples (sensitivity in smear-negative TB: 62%). Outcomes included projected life expectancy, lifetime costs (2010 US$), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Strategies with ICERs less than $7100 (South African gross domestic product per capita) were considered very cost-effective.
Results: Compared with no screening, life expectancy in TB-infected patients increased by 1.6 months using smear in symptomatic patients and by 6.6 months with two Xpert samples in all patients. At 22% TB prevalence, the ICER of smear for all patients was $2800 per year of life saved (YLS), and of Xpert (two samples) for all patients was $5100/YLS. Strategies involving one Xpert sample or symptom screening were less efficient.
Conclusion: Model-based analysis suggests that screening all individuals initiating ART in South Africa with two Xpert samples is very cost-effective.
Hassan S, Mustafa T, Muller W, Torres L, Marijani M, Ngadaya E PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(8):e0003414.
PMID: 39116052 PMC: 11309377. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003414.
Pei P, Fitzmaurice K, Le M, Panella C, Jones M, Pandya A MDM Policy Pract. 2023; 8(2):23814683231198873.
PMID: 37743931 PMC: 10517616. DOI: 10.1177/23814683231198873.
Kaso A, Hailu A PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0259056.
PMID: 34695153 PMC: 8544827. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259056.
Tuberculosis screening costs and cost-effectiveness in high-risk groups: a systematic review.
Alsdurf H, Empringham B, Miller C, Zwerling A BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1):935.
PMID: 34496804 PMC: 8425319. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06633-3.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Risk Groups Tuberculosis Screening in Malaysia.
Mohd Hassan N, Razali A, Shahari M, Mohd Nor Sham Kunusagaran M, Halili J, Zaimi N Front Public Health. 2021; 9:699735.
PMID: 34322473 PMC: 8310930. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.699735.