» Articles » PMID: 22331557

Two-dimensional Sonographic Placental Measurements in the Prediction of Small-for-gestational-age Infants

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 15
PMID 22331557
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the utility of two-dimensional (2D) sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants.

Methods: The maximal diameter along the fetal surface of the placenta and the maximal placental thickness were measured at 18-24 weeks' gestation, and the measurements repeated in the orthogonal plane. 'Biometric lags' were calculated as the difference between sonographic gestational age, estimated using each of a number of fetal biometric measurements, and actual gestational age. These variables were analyzed individually and in combination as predictors of birth weight<10(th) percentile (SGA<10) and <5(th) percentile (SGA<5).

Results: 1909 singleton pregnancies were included. Mean placental diameter (SGA<10, P<0.001; SGA<5, P=0.002) and thickness (SGA<10, P<0.006; SGA<5, P=0.065) were significantly smaller in SGA pregnancies. The biometric lags were greater in SGA pregnancies, the lag in abdominal circumference (AC) being the most predictive of SGA (P<0.0001). Multivariable models were significantly predictive of both SGA<10(th) percentile (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) =0.7404) and <5(th) percentile (AUC=0.7204), the best fitting models including AC lag and mean placental diameter and thickness.

Conclusions: 2D placental measurements taken in mid-gestation are significantly associated with the incidence of SGA. Biometric lags can improve the predictive ability further. These easily obtained variables should be considered in future efforts to develop a clinically useful predictive model for adverse outcome of pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Reference Ranges of 2-Dimensional Placental Biometry and 3-Dimensional Placental Volume between 11 and 14 Weeks of Gestation.

Trilla Sola C, Roca J, Olive E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061694 PMC: 11276113. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141556.


Multi-centre deep learning for placenta segmentation in obstetric ultrasound with multi-observer and cross-country generalization.

Andreasen L, Feragen A, Christensen A, Thybo J, Svendsen M, Zepf K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2221.

PMID: 36755050 PMC: 9908915. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29105-x.


The Ability of Ultrasound Sonography (USG) to Detect Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy With the Gold Standard of IUGR (Parameters by USG Hadlock) as a Diagnostic Criterion.

Rafique Z, Awan M, Iqbal S, Usmani N, Ahmad M, Amjad M Cureus. 2022; 13(12):e20523.

PMID: 35070557 PMC: 8767181. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20523.


Ultrasonographic placental thickness versus fetal outcome: A prospective study in Southern India.

Shinde G, Kshirsagar N, Laddad M, Shivade V Caspian J Intern Med. 2021; 12(4):562-567.

PMID: 34820063 PMC: 8590402. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.12.4.562.


Fully Automated Placental Volume Quantification From 3D Ultrasound for Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants.

Schwartz N, Oguz I, Wang J, Pouch A, Yushkevich N, Parameshwaran S J Ultrasound Med. 2021; 41(6):1509-1524.

PMID: 34553780 PMC: 8940735. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15835.