» Articles » PMID: 22331456

Impact of National Smoke-free Legislation on Home Smoking Bans: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2012 Feb 15
PMID 22331456
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To measure changes in prevalence and predictors of home smoking bans (HSBs) among smokers in four European countries after the implementation of national smoke-free legislation.

Design: Two waves of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys, which is a prospective panel study. Pre- and post-legislation data were used from Ireland, France, Germany and the Netherlands. Two pre-legislation waves from the UK were used as control.

Participants: 4634 respondents from the intervention countries and 1080 from the control country completed both baseline and follow-up and were included in the present analyses.

Methods: Multiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of having or of adopting a total HSB, and Generalised Estimating Equation models to compare patterns of change after implementation of smoke-free legislation to a control country without such legislation.

Results: Most smokers had at least partial smoking restrictions in their home, but the proportions varied significantly between countries. After implementation of national smoke-free legislation, the proportion of smokers with a total HSB increased significantly in all four countries. Among continuing smokers, the number of cigarettes smoked per day either remained stable or decreased significantly. Multiple logistic regression models indicated that having a young child in the household and supporting smoking bans in bars were important correlates of having a pre-legislation HSB. Prospective predictors of imposing a HSB between survey waves were planning to quit smoking, supporting a total smoking ban in bars and the birth of a child. Generalised Estimating Equation models indicated that the change in total HSB in the intervention countries was greater than that in the control country.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that smoke-free legislation does not lead to more smoking in smokers' homes. On the contrary, our findings demonstrate that smoke-free legislation may stimulate smokers to establish total smoking bans in their homes.

Citing Articles

Best practices for secondhand smoke and secondhand aerosol protection and evidence supporting the expansion of smoke- and aerosol-free environments: Recommendations from the 2nd Joint Action on Tobacco Control.

Possenti I, Gallus S, Lugo A, Lopez A, Carreras G, Fernandez-Megina R Tob Prev Cessat. 2024; 10.

PMID: 39434811 PMC: 11491856. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/193147.


Best practices for expansion of smoke-free and aerosol-free environments in Europe: Protocol for the consultation to experts.

Carnicer-Pont D, Luque A, Kilibarda B, Vasic M, Penzes M, Stival C Tob Prev Cessat. 2024; 10.

PMID: 39430870 PMC: 11487914. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/192786.


A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.

Akter S, Rahman M, Rouyard T, Aktar S, Nsashiyi R, Nakamura R Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(12):2367-2391.

PMID: 39375543 PMC: 11659173. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7.


Changes in prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in secondhand smoke exposure in Spanish children, 2016-2019.

Sanz-Mas M, Continente X, Henderson E, Fernandez E, Schiaffino A, Perez-Rios M Tob Induc Dis. 2024; 22.

PMID: 38910916 PMC: 11191057. DOI: 10.18332/tid/189392.


Impact of cigarette price and tobacco control policies on youth smoking experimentation in Albania.

Merkaj E, Zhllima E, Imami D, Gjika I, Guerrero-Lopez C, Drope J Tob Control. 2024; 33(Suppl 2):s38-s43.

PMID: 38443163 PMC: 11187397. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-058196.


References
1.
Borland R, Mullins R, Trotter L, White V . Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia. Tob Control. 1999; 8(3):266-71. PMC: 1763956. DOI: 10.1136/tc.8.3.266. View

2.
Jarvis M, Sims M, Gilmore A, Mindell J . Impact of smoke-free legislation on children's exposure to secondhand smoke: cotinine data from the Health Survey for England. Tob Control. 2011; 21(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2010.041608. View

3.
Rayens M, Hahn E, Langley R, Hedgecock S, Butler K, Greathouse-Maggio L . Public opinion and smoke-free laws. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2008; 8(4):262-70. DOI: 10.1177/1527154407312736. View

4.
Borland R, Yong H, Cummings K, Hyland A, Anderson S, Fong G . Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii42-50. PMC: 2593064. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.012492. View

5.
Edwards R, Gifford H, Waa A, Glover M, Thomson G, Wilson N . Beneficial impacts of a national smokefree environments law on an indigenous population: a multifaceted evaluation. Int J Equity Health. 2009; 8:12. PMC: 2684098. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-12. View