» Articles » PMID: 22331391

Dual Process Interaction Model of HIV-risk Behaviors Among Drug Offenders

Overview
Journal AIDS Behav
Date 2012 Feb 15
PMID 22331391
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated dual process interaction models of HIV-risk behavior among drug offenders. A dual process approach suggests that decisions to engage in appetitive behaviors result from a dynamic interplay between a relatively automatic associative system and an executive control system. One synergistic type of interplay suggests that executive functions may dampen or block effects of spontaneously activated associations. Consistent with this model, latent variable interaction analyses revealed that drug offenders scoring higher in affective decision making were relatively protected from predictive effects of spontaneous sex associations promoting risky sex. Among drug offenders with lower levels of affective decision making ability, spontaneous sexually-related associations more strongly predicted risky sex (lack of condom use and greater number of sex partners). These findings help elucidate associative and control process effects on appetitive behaviors and are important for explaining why some individuals engage in risky sex, while others are relatively protected.

Citing Articles

Daily Associations Among Alcohol Intoxication, Partner Familiarity, Participant Effortful Control, Urgency, and PrEP Uptake on Sexual Behavior in Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Maisto S, Simons J, Palfai T, Moskal D, Luehring-Jones P Arch Sex Behav. 2021; 50(7):2843-2860.

PMID: 33594529 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01852-2.


Force of Habit: the Role of Routinized, Automatic Behaviors along the Path of Self-Regulation and Alcohol-Related Problems.

Walters K, Simons J Int J Behav Med. 2020; 27(1):52-64.

PMID: 31942684 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-019-09845-9.


Retail outlets prompt associative memories linked to the repeated use of nicotine and tobacco products among alternative high school students in California.

Pike J, Shono Y, Tan N, Xie B, Stacy A Addict Behav. 2019; 99:106067.

PMID: 31421582 PMC: 6791762. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106067.


Adolescents at risk for drug abuse: a 3-year dual-process analysis.

Ames S, Xie B, Shono Y, Stacy A Addiction. 2016; 112(5):852-863.

PMID: 28010052 PMC: 5382108. DOI: 10.1111/add.13742.


Affective decision-making moderates the effects of automatic associations on alcohol use among drug offenders.

Cappelli C, Ames S, Shono Y, Dust M, Stacy A Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016; 43(5):534-544.

PMID: 27624979 PMC: 6097230. DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1216557.


References
1.
Weingardt K, Stacy A, Leigh B . Automatic activation of alcohol concepts in response to positive outcomes of alcohol use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996; 20(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01038.x. View

2.
Houben K, Wiers R . Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009; 33(4):626-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00877.x. View

3.
Kalichman S . Co-occurrence of treatment nonadherence and continued HIV transmission risk behaviors: implications for positive prevention interventions. Psychosom Med. 2008; 70(5):593-7. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181773bce. View

4.
De Neys W . Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(5):428-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01723.x. View

5.
Dunn B, Dalgleish T, Lawrence A . The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 30(2):239-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001. View