» Articles » PMID: 22328831

Investigating Patient Expectations and Treatment Outcome in a Chronic Low Back Pain Population

Overview
Journal J Pain Res
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2012 Feb 14
PMID 22328831
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to measure the outcomes that patients consider clinically meaningful across four treatment domains - (1) pain, (2) fatigue, (3) emotional distress, and (4) level of interference - and determine if patients met their own success criteria. Additionally, the role of expectations in treatment outcome was examined. This study also aimed to determine how change in levels of pain, fatigue, disability, and level of interference varied according to the type of treatment delivered to participants.

Patients: Forty-seven chronic low back pain patients were recruited from university-affiliated pain clinics.

Design: The study design was longitudinal, consisting of two randomly assigned treatment conditions. The first treatment condition used opioid medication only and the second used both opioid medication and brief cognitive behavioral therapy. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were conducted, which occurred approximately 3 months after the initiation of treatment.

Outcome Measures: A patient-centered outcomes questionnaire was completed by participants at both pre- and post-treatment assessment.

Results: Results suggest that patients did not meet their own success criteria in treatment across any of the four domains. There was a significant main effect of time for level of pain indicating that both treatment groups had a decrease in their level of pain at post-treatment, F(1, 45) = 11.98, P < 0.001. There was a significant main effect of time for level of interference domain indicating that both groups experienced a reduction in the level of pain-related interference with daily activities, F(1, 45) = 5.46, P < 0.05. There were no significant effects of time for emotional distress or fatigue or any significant group by time interactions. Contrary to our hypothesis, no significant correlations were found between pretreatment expectations and usual level ratings at post-treatment across the four domains.

Conclusion: Patients sought larger reductions in pain, fatigue, level of distress, and level of interference than they attained at post-treatment. Enhancing opioid treatment with brief cognitive behavioral therapy did not yield additional improvements for the four domains assessed in patients with chronic low back pain.

Citing Articles

A formal evaluation of The Ottawa Hospital Pain Clinic orientation session: A quality improvement project.

Poulin P, Bell L, Rice D, Shergill Y, Fitzgerald S, Cantave R Can J Pain. 2023; 7(1):2111993.

PMID: 36643864 PMC: 9839373. DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2111993.


A feasibility study on yoga's mechanism of action for chronic low back pain: psychological and neurophysiological changes, including global gene expression and DNA methylation, following a yoga intervention for chronic low back pain.

Adhikari B, Starkweather A, Xu W, Acabchuk R, Ramesh D, Eze B Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022; 8(1):142.

PMID: 35794661 PMC: 9260994. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01103-2.


Effects of Physical Activity on Neurophysiological and Gene Expression Profiles in Chronic Back Pain: Study Protocol.

Kim K, Ramesh D, Perry M, Bernier K, Young E, Walsh S Nurs Res. 2019; 69(1):74-81.

PMID: 31834118 PMC: 8935666. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000400.


[Mid-term effectiveness of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion for lumbar disc degeneration].

Yao Y, Ye D, Liang W, Miao H, Wu J, Zhou Z Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(3):280-286.

PMID: 30874382 PMC: 8337932. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807099.


Patients' perceived needs for medical services for non-specific low back pain: A systematic scoping review.

Chou L, Ranger T, Peiris W, Cicuttini F, Urquhart D, Sullivan K PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0204885.

PMID: 30408039 PMC: 6224057. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204885.


References
1.
Brown J, Edwards P, Atchison J, Lafayette-Lucey A, Wittmer V, Robinson M . Defining patient-centered, multidimensional success criteria for treatment of chronic spine pain. Pain Med. 2008; 9(7):851-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00357.x. View

2.
Teh C, Karp J, Kleinman A, Reynolds Iii C, Weiner D, Cleary P . Older people's experiences of patient-centered treatment for chronic pain: a qualitative study. Pain Med. 2009; 10(3):521-30. PMC: 2841780. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00556.x. View

3.
Turk D . Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2002; 18(6):355-65. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200211000-00003. View

4.
Farrar J . What is clinically meaningful: outcome measures in pain clinical trials. Clin J Pain. 2000; 16(2 Suppl):S106-12. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200006001-00018. View

5.
Robinson M, Brown J, George S, Edwards P, Atchison J, Hirsh A . Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective. Pain Med. 2005; 6(5):336-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00059.x. View