» Articles » PMID: 22327599

Prevalence of Yersinia Enterocolitica in Pigs Slaughtered in Chinese Abattoirs

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 14
PMID 22327599
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica in slaughtered pigs in China was studied. A total of 8,773 samples were collected and examined from different pig abattoirs in 11 provinces from 2009 to 2011. Of these, 4,495 were oral-pharyngeal swab (tonsils) samples from pigs, 1,239 were from intestinal contents, and 3,039 were feces samples from abattoirs or local pigpens. The data showed that 1,132 strains were obtained, from which the isolation rate for Yersinia enterocolitica was 19.53% (878/4,495) from the tonsil samples, 7.51% (93/1,239) from intestinal contents, and 5.30% (161/3,039) from feces. Of the 850 pathogenic Yersinia strains, except for three of bioserotype 2/O:9 and three of bioserotype 4/O:3, most (844/850) were of bioserotype 3/O:3. Interestingly, pathogenic Y. enterocolitica accounted for the majority of the isolated strains from most provinces (85.17% to 100%), whereas from Heilongjiang, 96.52% (111/115) were classified as nonpathogenic biotype 1A with various serotypes, and only 3.48% of the strains (4/115) were pathogenic 3/O:3. All of the pathogenic strains were analyzed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and 49 patterns were obtained for the O:3 pathogenic strains; most of them were K6GN11C30021 (53.13%: 450/847) and K6GN11C30012 (21.37%: 181/847). Several strains from diarrhea patient samples revealed PFGE patterns identical to that from samples of local pigs, suggesting a possible link between porcine isolates and human infection. The results above suggested that Yersinia enterocolitica in slaughtered pigs from Chinese abattoirs was characterized by region-specific PFGE patterns and confirmed that strains isolated from pigs are closely related to those from human infections.

Citing Articles

Pathogenicity and virulence of .

Seabaugh J, Anderson D Virulence. 2024; 15(1):2316439.

PMID: 38389313 PMC: 10896167. DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2024.2316439.


An Update in Knowledge of Pigs as the Source of Zoonotic Pathogens.

Augustyniak A, Pomorska-Mol M Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37894005 PMC: 10603695. DOI: 10.3390/ani13203281.


Prevalence and characteristics of foodborne pathogens from slaughtered pig carcasses in Korea.

Hong S, Kang H, Lee H, Jung H, Moon J, Yoon S Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1158196.

PMID: 37065220 PMC: 10103459. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1158196.


Whole-genome sequencing-based prediction and analysis of antimicrobial resistance in from Ningxia, China.

Yue Y, Shen M, Liu X, Hao Q, Kang Y, Che Y Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:936425.

PMID: 35942314 PMC: 9356307. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.936425.


Global Prevalence of in Cases of Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Riahi S, Ahmadi E, Zeinali T Int J Microbiol. 2021; 2021:1499869.

PMID: 34512763 PMC: 8433020. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1499869.


References
1.
Wang X, Qiu H, Jin D, Cui Z, Kan B, Xiao Y . O:8 serotype Yersinia enterocolitica strains in China. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 125(3):259-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.04.016. View

2.
Horter D, Yoon K, Zimmerman J . A review of porcine tonsils in immunity and disease. Anim Health Res Rev. 2004; 4(2):143-55. DOI: 10.1079/ahr200358. View

3.
Bhaduri S, Wesley I, Bush E . Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains in pigs in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(11):7117-21. PMC: 1287643. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7117-7121.2005. View

4.
Thoerner P, Bin Kingombe C, Bogli-Stuber K, Bissig-Choisat B, Wassenaar T, Frey J . PCR detection of virulence genes in Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and investigation of virulence gene distribution. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(3):1810-6. PMC: 150046. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1810-1816.2003. View

5.
Funk J, Troutt H, Davis S, Fossler C . In vitro susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from the oral cavity of swine. J Food Prot. 2000; 63(3):395-9. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.3.395. View