» Articles » PMID: 22320805

Automated Teniae Coli Detection and Identification on Computed Tomographic Colonography

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2012 Feb 11
PMID 22320805
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive technique for colonic polyps and cancer screening. Teniae coli are three bands of longitudinal smooth muscle on the colon surface. Teniae coli are important anatomically meaningful landmarks on human colon. In this paper, the authors propose an automatic teniae coli detection method for CT colonography.

Methods: The original CTC slices are first segmented and reconstructed to a 3D colon surface. Then, the 3D colon surface is unfolded using a reversible projection technique. After that the unfolded colon is projected to a 2D height map. The teniae coli are detected using the height map and then reversely projected back to the 3D colon. Since teniae are located at the junctions where the haustral folds meet, the authors apply 2D Gabor filter banks to extract features of haustral folds. The maximum response of the filter banks is then selected as the feature image. The fold centers are then identified based on local maxima and thresholding on the feature image. Connecting the fold centers yields a path of the folds. Teniae coli are extracted as lines running between the fold paths. The authors used the spatial relationship between ileocecal valve (ICV) and teniae mesocolica (TM) to identify the TM, then the teniae omentalis (TO) and the teniae libera (TL) can be identified subsequently.

Results: The authors tested the proposed method on 47 cases of 37 patients, 10 of the patients with both supine and prone CT scans. The proposed method yielded performance with an average normalized root mean square error (RMSE) ( ± standard deviation [95% confidence interval]) of 4.87% ( ± 2.93%, [4.05% 5.69%]).

Conclusions: The proposed fully-automated teniae coli detection and identification method is accurate and promising for future clinical applications.

Citing Articles

Is it possible to give a single definition of the rectosigmoid junction?.

Massalou D, Moszkowicz D, Mariage D, Baque P, Camuzard O, Bronsard N Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 40(4):431-438.

PMID: 29218384 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-017-1954-4.


Associations among pericolonic fat, visceral fat, and colorectal polyps on CT colonography.

Liu J, Pattanaik S, Yao J, Dwyer A, Pickhardt P, Choi J Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015; 23(2):408-14.

PMID: 25558027 PMC: 4310815. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20987.


Feasibility of using the marginal blood vessels as reference landmarks for CT colonography.

Wei Z, Yao J, Wang S, Liu J, Dwyer A, Pickhardt P AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 202(1):W50-8.

PMID: 24370165 PMC: 4308041. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10463.

References
1.
Summers R, Beaulieu C, Pusanik L, Malley J, Jeffrey Jr R, Glazer D . Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology. 2000; 216(1):284-90. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl43284. View

2.
Franaszek M, Summers R, Pickhardt P, Choi J . Hybrid segmentation of colon filled with air and opacified fluid for CT colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25(3):358-68. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.863836. View

3.
Summers R, Yao J, Johnson C . CT colonography with computer-aided detection: automated recognition of ileocecal valve to reduce number of false-positive detections. Radiology. 2004; 233(1):266-72. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2331031326. View

4.
Daugman J . Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Res. 1980; 20(10):847-56. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90065-6. View

5.
Fletcher J, Johnson C, Welch T, MacCarty R, Ahlquist D, Reed J . Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology. 2000; 216(3):704-11. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au41704. View