» Articles » PMID: 22311947

Factors Influencing Patient Choice of Dialysis Versus Conservative Care to Treat End-stage Kidney Disease

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2012 Feb 8
PMID 22311947
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For every patient with chronic kidney disease who undergoes renal-replacement therapy, there is one patient who undergoes conservative management of their disease. We aimed to determine the most important characteristics of dialysis and the trade-offs patients were willing to make in choosing dialysis instead of conservative care.

Methods: We conducted a discrete choice experiment involving adults with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease from eight renal clinics in Australia. We assessed the influence of treatment characteristics (life expectancy, number of visits to the hospital per week, ability to travel, time spent undergoing dialysis [i.e., time spent attached to a dialysis machine per treatment, measured in hours], time of day at which treatment occurred, availability of subsidized transport and flexibility of the treatment schedule) on patients' preferences for dialysis versus conservative care.

Results: Of 151 patients invited to participate, 105 completed our survey. Patients were more likely to choose dialysis than conservative care if dialysis involved an increased average life expectancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-2.15), if they were able to dialyse during the day or evening rather than during the day only (OR 8.95, 95% CI 4.46-17.97), and if subsidized transport was available (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.24-1.95). Patients were less likely to choose dialysis over conservative care if an increase in the number of visits to hospital was required (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.88) and if there were more restrictions on their ability to travel (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.36-0.61). Patients were willing to forgo 7 months of life expectancy to reduce the number of required visits to hospital and 15 months of life expectancy to increase their ability to travel.

Interpretation: Patients approaching end-stage kidney disease are willing to trade considerable life expectancy to reduce the burden and restrictions imposed by dialysis.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Palliative Care Intervention among Older Adults with Advanced CKD and Their Caregivers.

Saeed F, Horowitz R, Allen R, Auinger P, Epstein R, Fiscella K Kidney360. 2025; 6(2):236-246.

PMID: 40014547 PMC: 11882250. DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000622.


Kidney replacement therapies in the older person: challenges to decide the best option.

Selwood J, Dani M, Corbett R, Brown E Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(2):sfaf020.

PMID: 39995809 PMC: 11848140. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf020.


Hierarchical Medical: What are the Factors Driving ESKD Patients to Choose Community Hemodialysis Centers in China? A Labelled Discrete Choice Experiment.

Xiong J, Zhang H, Ma H Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:2441-2454.

PMID: 39660223 PMC: 11629663. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S484608.


Providers' Experiences Discussing Care for Patients with Kidney Failure Who Forgo KRT: A National Qualitative Study.

Wong S, Chotivatanapong J, Lee D, Lam D, van Eijk M Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024; 19(10):1284-1291.

PMID: 39437985 PMC: 11469789. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000522.


Preparing for responsive management versus preparing for renal dialysis in multimorbid older people with advanced chronic kidney disease (Prepare for Kidney Care): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Worthington J, Soundy A, Frost J, Rooshenas L, MacNeill S, Realpe Rojas A Trials. 2024; 25(1):688.

PMID: 39420412 PMC: 11487988. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08509-8.


References
1.
Carson R, Juszczak M, Davenport A, Burns A . Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease?. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4(10):1611-9. PMC: 2758251. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00510109. View

2.
Bridges J, Hauber A, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser L, Regier D . Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011; 14(4):403-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. View

3.
Gorodetskaya I, Zenios S, McCulloch C, Bostrom A, Hsu C, Bindman A . Health-related quality of life and estimates of utility in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005; 68(6):2801-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00752.x. View

4.
Morton R, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster A . The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ. 2010; 340:c112. PMC: 2808468. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c112. View

5.
Bryan S, Gold L, Sheldon R, Buxton M . Preference measurement using conjoint methods: an empirical investigation of reliability. Health Econ. 2000; 9(5):385-95. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1050(200007)9:5<385::aid-hec533>3.0.co;2-w. View