Rectocele--does the Size Matter?

Overview

Journal Int J Colorectal Dis

Specialties Gastroenterology
General Surgery

Date 2012 Feb 7

PMID 22307846

Citations 8

Authors

Dan Carter

Marc Beer Gabel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Large rectoceles (>2 cm) are believed to be associated with difficulty in evacuation, constipation, rectal pain, and rectal bleeding. The aim of our study was to determine whether rectocele size is related to patient's symptoms or defecatory parameters.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on data collected on patients referred to our clinic for the evaluation of evacuation disorders. All patients were questioned for constipation, fecal incontinence, and irritable bowel syndrome and were assessed with dynamic perineal ultrasonography and conventional anorectal manometry.

Results: Four hundred eighty-seven women were included in our study. Rectocele was diagnosed in 106 (22%) women, and rectocele diameter >2 cm in 93 (87%) women. Rectocele size was not significantly related to demographic data, parity, or patient's symptoms. The severity of the symptoms was not correlated to the size or to the position of the rectocele. The diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome was neither related to the size of the rectocele. Rectocele location, occurrence of enterocele, and intussusception were not related to the size of the rectocele. Full evacuation of rectoceles was more common in small rectoceles (79% vs. 24%, p = 0.0001), and no evacuation was more common in large rectoceles (37% vs. 0, p = 0.01). Rectal hyposensitivity and anismus were not related to the size of the rectocele.

Conclusion: In conclusion, only the evacuation of rectoceles was correlated to the size of the rectoceles, but had no clinical significance. Other clinical, anatomical factors were also not associated to the size of the rectoceles. Rectoceles' size alone may not be an indication for surgery.

Citing Articles

A possible physiological mechanism of rectocele formation in women.

Sun G, de Haas R, Trzpis M, Broens P Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 48(4):1203-1214.

PMID: 36745205 PMC: 10115871. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03807-2.

Rectocele: Incidental or important? Observe or operate? Contemporary diagnosis and management in the multidisciplinary era.

Bharucha A, Knowles C Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022; 34(11):e14453.

PMID: 36102693 PMC: 9887546. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14453.

Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Fluoroscopic Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders : Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society....

Paquette I, Rosman D, Sayed R, Hull T, Kocjancic E, Quiroz L Tech Coloproctol. 2021; 25(1):3-17.

PMID: 33394215 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02376-6.

Functional Disorders: Rectocele.

Mustain W Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017; 30(1):63-75.

PMID: 28144214 PMC: 5179273. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593425.

Anismus, Physiology, Radiology: Is It Time for Some Pragmatism? A Comparative Study of Radiological and Anorectal Physiology Findings in Patients With Anismus.

Pisano U, Irvine L, Szczachor J, Jawad A, MacLeod A, Lim M Ann Coloproctol. 2016; 32(5):170-174.

PMID: 27847787 PMC: 5108663. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.170.

References

Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner S . A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39(6):681-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02056950. View

Turnbull G, Bartram C, Lennard-Jones J . Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988; 31(3):190-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02552545. View

Johansson C, Nilsson B, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Holmstrom B . Paradoxical sphincter reaction and associated colorectal disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992; 7(2):89-94. DOI: 10.1007/BF00341293. View

Dietz H, Steensma A . The role of childbirth in the aetiology of rectocele. BJOG. 2006; 113(3):264-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00860.x. View

Hausammann R, Steffen T, Weishaupt D, Beutner U, Hetzer F . Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?. Tech Coloproctol. 2009; 13(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-009-0454-x. View

Bartolo D, Roe A . Obstructed defaecation. Br J Hosp Med. 1986; 35(4):228-36. View

Ting K, Mangel E, Muller-Lissner S . Is the volume retained after defecation a valuable parameter at defecography?. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992; 35(8):762-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050326. View

Infantino A, Masin A, Melega E, Dodi G, Lise M . Does surgery resolve outlet obstruction from rectocele?. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995; 10(2):97-100. DOI: 10.1007/BF00341206. View

Oberwalder M, Thaler K, Baig M, Dinnewitzer A, Efron J, Weiss E . Anal ultrasound and endosonographic measurement of perineal body thickness: a new evaluation for fecal incontinence in females. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(4):650-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8138-5. View

10.

Gladman M, Scott S, Chan C, Williams N, Lunniss P . Rectal hyposensitivity: prevalence and clinical impact in patients with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1097/01.DCR.0000044711.76085.86. View

11.

Halligan S, Bartram C . Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant?. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38(7):764-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02048038. View

12.

Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N, Lurie Y, Malnick S, Bass D . Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45(2):239-45; discussion 245-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6155-7. View

13.

Hiller L, Radley S, Mann C, Radley S, Begum G, Pretlove S . Development and validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of bowel and lower urinary tract symptoms in women. BJOG. 2002; 109(4):413-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01147.x. View

14.

Murad-Regadas S, Regadas F, Rodrigues L, Oliveira L, Barreto R, de Souza M . Types of pelvic floor dysfunctions in nulliparous, vaginal delivery, and cesarean section female patients with obstructed defecation syndrome identified by echodefecography. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24(10):1227-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0746-7. View

15.

Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L . The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999; 10(2):96-9. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004019. View

16.

Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W . Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology. 1999; 210(1):103-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99dc48103. View

17.

Beck D, Allen N . Rectocele. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011; 23(2):90-8. PMC: 2967328. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1254295. View

18.

Zbar A, Beer-Gabel M, Aslam M . Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001; 16(5):307-12. DOI: 10.1007/s003840100315. View

19.

Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti DUrso A . A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the 'iceberg diagram'. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8(9):785-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01138.x. View

20.

JORGE J, Wexner S . Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36(1):77-97. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050307. View