» Articles » PMID: 22307104

Evaluating the Travel, Physical Activity and Carbon Impacts of a 'natural Experiment' in the Provision of New Walking and Cycling Infrastructure: Methods for the Core Module of the IConnect Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Feb 7
PMID 22307104
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Improving infrastructure to support walking and cycling is often regarded as fundamental to encouraging their widespread uptake. However, there is little evidence that specific provision of this kind has led to a significant increase in walking or cycling in practice, let alone wider impacts such as changes in overall physical activity or carbon emissions. Connect2 is a major new project that aims to promote walking and cycling in the UK by improving local pedestrian and cycle routes. It therefore provides a useful opportunity to contribute new evidence in this field by means of a natural experimental study.

Methods And Analysis: iConnect is an independent study that aims to integrate the perspectives of public health and transport research on the measurement and evaluation of the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of the Connect2 programme. In this paper, the authors report the study design and methods for the iConnect core module. This comprised a cohort study of residents living within 5 km of three case study Connect2 projects in Cardiff, Kenilworth and Southampton, supported by a programme of qualitative interviews with key informants about the projects. Participants were asked to complete postal questionnaires, repeated before and after the opening of the new infrastructure, which collected data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, travel, car fuel purchasing and physical activity, and potential psychosocial and environmental correlates and mediators of those behaviours. In the absence of suitable no-intervention control groups, the study design drew on heterogeneity in exposure both within and between case study samples to provide for a counterfactual.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study was approved by the University of Southampton Research Ethics Committee. The findings will be disseminated through academic presentations, peer-reviewed publications and the study website (http://www.iconnect.ac.uk) and by means of a national seminar at the end of the study.

Citing Articles

The ENJOY Seniors Exercise Park IMP-ACT project: IMProving older people's health through physical ACTivity: a hybrid II implementation design study protocol.

Levinger P, Fearn M, Dreher B, Bauman A, Brusco N, Gilbert A Arch Public Health. 2024; 82(1):43.

PMID: 38532524 PMC: 10964688. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01262-z.


Comprehensive assessment of physical activity policies and initiatives in Saudi Arabia 2016-2022.

Almarzooqi M, Alsukait R, Aljuraiban G, Alothman S, AlAhmed R, Rakic S Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1236287.

PMID: 37614443 PMC: 10443594. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1236287.


Development and optimisation of a multi-component workplace intervention to increase cycling for the Cycle Nation Project.

Connell H, Logan G, Somers C, Baker G, Broadfield S, Bunn C Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:857554.

PMID: 36385778 PMC: 9643150. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.857554.


Use of natural experimental studies to evaluate 20mph speed limits in two major UK cities.

Milton K, Kelly M, Baker G, Cleland C, Cope A, Craig N J Transp Health. 2021; 22:101141.

PMID: 34603959 PMC: 8463832. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101141.


Sharing believable stories: A qualitative study exploring the relevance of case studies for influencing the creation of healthy environments.

Le Gouais A, Foley L, Ogilvie D, Panter J, Guell C Health Place. 2021; 71:102615.

PMID: 34320460 PMC: 8520914. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102615.


References
1.
Ogilvie D, Griffin S, Jones A, Mackett R, Guell C, Panter J . Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:703. PMC: 2999608. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-703. View

2.
Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S . Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 66(12):1182-6. PMC: 3796763. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. View

3.
Wahlgren L, Stigell E, Schantz P . The active commuting route environment scale (ACRES): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7:58. PMC: 2914072. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-58. View

4.
Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C . Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?. Public Health. 2005; 119(9):751-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.11.008. View

5.
de Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Anto J, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C . Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2011; 37(4):766-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003. View