» Articles » PMID: 22298832

The Contribution of Vision, Proprioception, and Efference Copy in Storing a Neural Representation for Guiding Trail Leg Trajectory over an Obstacle

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2012 Feb 3
PMID 22298832
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stepping over obstacles requires vision to guide the leading leg, but direct visual information is not available to guide the trailing leg. The neural mechanisms for establishing a stored obstacle representation and thus facilitating the trail leg trajectory in humans are unknown. Twenty-four subjects participated in one of three experiments, which were designed to investigate the contribution of visual, proprioceptive, and efference copy signals. Subjects stepped over an obstacle with their lead leg, stopped, and straddled the obstacle for a delay period before stepping over it with their trail leg while toe elevation was recorded. Subsequently, we calculated maximum toe elevation and toe clearance. First, we found that subjects could accurately scale trail leg toe elevation and clearance, despite straddling an obstacle for up to 2 min, similar to quadrupeds. Second, we found that when the lead leg was passively moved over an obstacle (eliminating an efference copy signal and altering proprioception) without vision, trail leg toe elevation and clearance were reduced, and variability increased compared with when subjects actively moved their lead leg. Trail leg toe measures returned to normal when vision was provided during the passive manipulation. Finally, we found that altering lead leg proprioceptive feedback by adding mass to the ankle had no effect on trail leg toe measures. Taken together, our results suggest that humans can store a neural representation of obstacle properties for extended periods of time and that vision appears to be sufficient in this process to guide trail leg trajectory.

Citing Articles

Adaptive walking performance is related to the hip joint position sense during active hip flexion rather than during passive hip flexion.

Matsui T, Hirata K, Miyamoto N, Akagi R Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 7:1510447.

PMID: 40017816 PMC: 11865228. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1510447.


Gender Differences in Joint Biomechanics During Obstacle Crossing with Different Heights.

Wang C, Guo Y, Du W, Li Z, Chen W Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001708 PMC: 11851498. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020189.


Differences in gait parameters when crossing real versus projected everyday life obstacles in healthy children and adolescents.

Groble S, van Hedel H, Keller J, Ammann-Reiffer C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7848.

PMID: 37188711 PMC: 10185558. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34276-8.


Probing the deployment of peripheral visual attention during obstacle-crossing planning.

Malik R, Marigold D, Chow M, Lam T Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:1039201.

PMID: 36618994 PMC: 9813236. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1039201.


Visuospatial working memory and obstacle crossing in young and older people.

Chu N, Sturnieks D, Lord S, Menant J Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(11):2871-2883.

PMID: 36112172 PMC: 9587940. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06458-9.