» Articles » PMID: 22298054

National Trends in Rotator Cuff Repair

Overview
Date 2012 Feb 3
PMID 22298054
Citations 256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent publications suggest that arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repairs have had comparable clinical results, although each technique has distinct advantages and disadvantages. National hospital and ambulatory surgery databases were reviewed to identify practice patterns for rotator cuff repair.

Methods: The rates of medical visits for rotator cuff pathology, and the rates of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were examined for the years 1996 and 2006 in the United States. The national incidence of rotator cuff repairs and related data were obtained from inpatient (National Hospital Discharge Survey, NHDS) and ambulatory surgery (National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery, NSAS) databases. These databases were queried with use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes for arthroscopic (ICD-9 codes 83.63 and 80.21) and open (code 83.63 without code 80.21) rotator cuff repair. We also examined where the surgery was performed (inpatient versus ambulatory surgery center) and characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, and comorbidities.

Results: The unadjusted volume of all rotator cuff repairs increased 141% in the decade from 1996 to 2006. The unadjusted number of arthroscopic procedures increased by 600% while open repairs increased by only 34% during this time interval. There was a significant shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The increase in national rates of rotator cuff repair over the last decade has been dramatic, particularly for arthroscopic assisted repair.

Citing Articles

Forty-Two Percent of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Are Using Psychotropic Medications.

Cesarek M, Gerard 3rd N, Griswold B, Rumps M, OBrien M, Savoie 3rd F Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 7(1):101030.

PMID: 40041838 PMC: 11873550. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101030.


Decellularized tendon patch enhance biological and mechanical healing of large-to-massive rotator cuff tear in a rat chronic model: a comparison study of patch sterilization and storage methods.

Mao Y, Wang Y, Liu S, Liu Z, Yao P, Sun B J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):218.

PMID: 40022094 PMC: 11871595. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05596-4.


Biomechanical enhancement in rotator cuff repairs: the impact of innovative nanofiber technology.

Johnson J, Gadomski B, Regan D, Johnson J, Nelson B, McGilvray K JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):116-122.

PMID: 39898213 PMC: 11784285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.203.


Analyzing practice pattern in treating partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a dual perspective from national database and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons PARCIAL research group.

Kim H, Leary E, Baker C, Barnes L, Creighton R, Cuomo F JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):91-97.

PMID: 39898209 PMC: 11784274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.196.


The Effect of Postoperative Tranexamic Acid and Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: a Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jiang X, Xu C, Yuan C, Gao W, Liu W, Wang Y J Pain Res. 2025; 18:259-270.

PMID: 39867540 PMC: 11759578. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S497297.


References
1.
Guttmann D, Graham R, MacLennan M, Lubowitz J . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the learning curve. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(4):394-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.12.006. View

2.
Morse K, Davis A, Afra R, Krall Kaye E, Schepsis A, Voloshin I . Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(9):1824-8. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508322903. View

3.
Gerber C, Schneeberger A, Perren S, Nyffeler R . Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(9):1281-90. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199909000-00009. View

4.
Gladstone J, Bishop J, Lo I, Flatow E . Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(5):719-28. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506297539. View

5.
Park M, ElAttrache N, Tibone J, Ahmad C, Jun B, Lee T . Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(4):461-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.010. View