» Articles » PMID: 22282552

Efficacy Predictors of Lung Volume Reduction with Zephyr Valves in a European Cohort

Overview
Journal Eur Respir J
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2012 Jan 28
PMID 22282552
Citations 105
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial (VENT) was a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of unilateral endobronchial valve (EBV) treatment. The purpose of this analysis was to assess outcomes in the previously unreported European VENT study cohort. Patients with advanced emphysema were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive Zephyr® (Pulmonx Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) EBV treatment (n = 111) or medical management (n = 60). At 6 months, EBV patients demonstrated a significant improvement compared with the controls for mean ± SD change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (7 ± 20% versus 0.5 ± 19%; p = 0.067), cycle ergometry (2 ± 14 W versus -3 ± 10 W; p = 0.04) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (-5 ± 14 points versus 0.3 ± 13 points; p = 0.047). At 12 months, the magnitude of the difference between groups for change from baseline was of similar magnitude to the differences seen at 6 months. Rates for complications did not differ significantly. EBV patients with computed tomography (CT) scans suggestive of complete fissure and lobar occlusion had a mean ± SD lobar volume reduction of -80 ± 30% and >50% met minimal clinical difference thresholds. The degree of emphysema heterogeneity did not preclude excellent outcomes. Unilateral lobar volume reduction using EBV treatment is safe and superior clinical results correlated with CT suggestive of complete fissures and successful lobar occlusion. Emphysema heterogeneity was not critical for determining positive outcomes.

Citing Articles

Outcome and safety 90 days after combined airway valve treatment of the right upper and middle lobes in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.

Dittrich A, De Pace C, Brock J, Trudzinski F, Heussel C, Eberhardt R Respir Res. 2025; 26(1):4.

PMID: 39762833 PMC: 11706069. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-03069-6.


Surgical and Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Severe Emphysema: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Yamamoto S, Horita N, Imai R, Niitsu T Lung. 2025; 203(1):22.

PMID: 39762564 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-024-00777-0.


Anesthesia for Bronchoscopy-An Update.

Goudra B, Sundararaman L, Chandar P, Green M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518611 PMC: 11546567. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216471.


Biofilm infections of endobronchial valves in COPD patients after endoscopic lung volume reduction: a pilot study with FISHseq.

Pappe E, Hubner R, Saccomanno J, Ebrahimi H, Witzenrath M, Wiessner A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23078.

PMID: 39366990 PMC: 11452729. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73950-3.


Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction as the Treatment of Choice versus Robotic-Assisted Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Similar Patients with Emphysema - An Initial Experience of the Benefits and Complications.

Lee M, Dhanji A, Perikleous P, Baranowski R, Lau K, Waller D Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024; 19:1021-1032.

PMID: 38741941 PMC: 11090187. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S442380.