» Articles » PMID: 22275876

Progressive Polycomb Assembly on H3K27me3 Compartments Generates Polycomb Bodies with Developmentally Regulated Motion

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2012 Jan 26
PMID 22275876
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are conserved chromatin factors that maintain silencing of key developmental genes outside of their expression domains. Recent genome-wide analyses showed a Polycomb (PC) distribution with binding to discrete PcG response elements (PREs). Within the cell nucleus, PcG proteins localize in structures called PC bodies that contain PcG-silenced genes, and it has been recently shown that PREs form local and long-range spatial networks. Here, we studied the nuclear distribution of two PcG proteins, PC and Polyhomeotic (PH). Thanks to a combination of immunostaining, immuno-FISH, and live imaging of GFP fusion proteins, we could analyze the formation and the mobility of PC bodies during fly embryogenesis as well as compare their behavior to that of the condensed fraction of euchromatin. Immuno-FISH experiments show that PC bodies mainly correspond to 3D structural counterparts of the linear genomic domains identified in genome-wide studies. During early embryogenesis, PC and PH progressively accumulate within PC bodies, which form nuclear structures localized on distinct euchromatin domains containing histone H3 tri-methylated on K27. Time-lapse analysis indicates that two types of motion influence the displacement of PC bodies and chromatin domains containing H2Av-GFP. First, chromatin domains and PC bodies coordinately undergo long-range motions that may correspond to the movement of whole chromosome territories. Second, each PC body and chromatin domain has its own fast and highly constrained motion. In this motion regime, PC bodies move within volumes slightly larger than those of condensed chromatin domains. Moreover, both types of domains move within volumes much smaller than chromosome territories, strongly restricting their possibility of interaction with other nuclear structures. The fast motion of PC bodies and chromatin domains observed during early embryogenesis strongly decreases in late developmental stages, indicating a possible contribution of chromatin dynamics in the maintenance of stable gene silencing.

Citing Articles

Double-strand breaks in facultative heterochromatin require specific movements and chromatin changes for efficient repair.

Wensveen M, Dixit A, van Schendel R, Kendek A, Lambooij J, Tijsterman M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8984.

PMID: 39419979 PMC: 11487122. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53313-2.


CBX7C⋅PHC2 interaction facilitates PRC1 assembly and modulates its phase separation properties.

Guan S, Tang J, Ma X, Miao R, Cheng B iScience. 2024; 27(4):109548.

PMID: 38600974 PMC: 11004992. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109548.


Dynamic microenvironments shape nuclear organization and gene expression.

Hayward-Lara G, Fischer M, Mir M Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2024; 86:102177.

PMID: 38461773 PMC: 11162947. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2024.102177.


Polycomb repression of Hox genes involves spatial feedback but not domain compaction or phase transition.

Murphy S, Boettiger A Nat Genet. 2024; 56(3):493-504.

PMID: 38361032 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01661-6.


A Two-Step Mechanism for Creating Stable, Condensed Chromatin with the Polycomb Complex PRC1.

Seif E, Francis N Molecules. 2024; 29(2).

PMID: 38257239 PMC: 10821450. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29020323.


References
1.
Cremer T, Cremer M, Dietzel S, Muller S, Solovei I, Fakan S . Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006; 18(3):307-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.007. View

2.
Schwartz Y, Kahn T, Nix D, Li X, Bourgon R, Biggin M . Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 2006; 38(6):700-5. DOI: 10.1038/ng1817. View

3.
Schuettengruber B, Ganapathi M, LeBlanc B, Portoso M, Jaschek R, Tolhuis B . Functional anatomy of polycomb and trithorax chromatin landscapes in Drosophila embryos. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(1):e13. PMC: 2621266. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000013. View

4.
Dundr M, Ospina J, Sung M, John S, Upender M, Ried T . Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2007; 179(6):1095-103. PMC: 2140015. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200710058. View

5.
Francis N, Kingston R, Woodcock C . Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex. Science. 2004; 306(5701):1574-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100576. View