» Articles » PMID: 22274971

Surgical Treatment of the Spinal Stenosis with an Interspinous Distraction Device: Do We Really Restore the Foraminal Height?

Overview
Journal Turk Neurosurg
Specialties Neurology
Neurosurgery
Date 2012 Jan 26
PMID 22274971
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of implantation of interspinous device is to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height and provide stability in order to improve the clinical outcome of surgery.

Material And Methods: After microsurgical decompression, Coflex™ device was applied. Patients were evaluated at a month after surgery and last follow-up using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Foraminal height and lumbar lordosis angle were recorded.

Results: The mean preoperative VAS was 7.85 and fell to 1.7 a month after surgery (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up the mean VAS score was 1.65 (p < 0.0001). The mean foraminal heights were measured 19.95 mm preoperatively and 25.05 mm a month after surgery (p < 0.0001). The mean foraminal height was 21.60 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.002). The mean lumbar lordosis were measured 32.05 and 34.3 degrees at preoperative and a month after surgery respectively (p=0.155). The mean lumbar lordosis was 32 (±5.99) degrees at the last follow-up (p=0.974).

Conclusion: Using the Coflex device is a minimal invasive, effective and safe procedure. Restoration of the foraminal height may not be a responsible factor for clinical improvement. We think microsurgical decompression looks responsible of the good clinical outcome and using interspinous device is unnecessary. Comparative clinical studies can be informative.

Citing Articles

Five-year radiological outcomes between decompression alone and decompression with an interlaminar device for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Chua C, Rajoo M, Thomas A, Lee S, Liang S, Kumar N J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(3):488-500.

PMID: 39399083 PMC: 11467290. DOI: 10.21037/jss-24-33.


Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Han B, Chen Y, Liang W, Yang Y, Ding Z, Yin P Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(3):881-891.

PMID: 38342843 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z.


Evaluating 5-year outcomes of interlaminar devices as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Kumar N, Thomas A, Rajoo M, Lee S, Kumar L, Shen L Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(4):1367-1374.

PMID: 36840820 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07610-x.


[Mid-term effectiveness of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion for lumbar disc degeneration].

Yao Y, Ye D, Liang W, Miao H, Wu J, Zhou Z Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(3):280-286.

PMID: 30874382 PMC: 8337932. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807099.


Spinal Stenosis in the Absence of Spondylolisthesis: Can Interlaminar Stabilization at Single and Multi-levels Provide Sustainable Relief?.

Abjornson C, Yoon B, Callanan T, Shein D, Grinberg S, Cammisa F Int J Spine Surg. 2018; 12(1):64-69.

PMID: 30280085 PMC: 6162044. DOI: 10.14444/5011.