» Articles » PMID: 22274293

[Smartphones in Ophthalmology : Relief or Toys for Physicians?]

Overview
Journal Ophthalmologe
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2012 Jan 26
PMID 22274293
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Smartphones offer a number of so-called medical and ophthalmic "apps" and their use will be investigated in this survey.

Methods: An Internet analysis was performed to identify available medical "apps" and evaluate their utilization. Search engines, developers' websites and webstores were screened with key words such as: "smartphone", "medical apps" and "eye test". The "apps" were evaluated for usability and with respective published reviews. In addition, an international survey among ophthalmologists asked about the use of a Smartphone and "apps" preferences. Direct inquiries were undertaken with developers on selected promising novel "apps".

Results: The more than 70 identified "apps" examined were subdivided into different categories A) examining function, B) photo and video recordings, C) office, D) patient education and informed consent as well as E) medical continued education functions and literature searching. The survey determined the iPhone to be the most popular Smartphone among the sampled ophthalmologists worldwide. Many popular "apps" have become available only recently and hence suffer in part from some initial technical problems. Some ophthalmic "apps" are very helpful in the emergency room or during consultations. Only a few "apps" were approved as medical products and therefore cannot substitute a full ophthalmic examination.

Conclusions: The increasing distribution of Smartphone "apps" in ophthalmology may have the potential to facilitate patient treatment, data management and communication.

Citing Articles

High User Acceptance of a Retina e-Learning App in Times of Increasing Digitalization of Medical Training for Ophthalmologists.

Kamouna A, Alten F, Grabowski E, Eter N, Clemens C Ophthalmologica. 2022; 245(4):368-375.

PMID: 35500550 PMC: 9393795. DOI: 10.1159/000524667.


Detecting Cataract Using Smartphones.

Askarian B, Ho P, Chong J IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2021; 9:3800110.

PMID: 34786216 PMC: 8580365. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3074597.


[Analysis of the importance of e-learning in ophthalmology and evaluation of an e-learning app].

Grabowski E, Alten F, Termuhlen J, Heiduschka P, Brucher V, Eter N Ophthalmologe. 2020; 117(12):1218-1224.

PMID: 32303832 PMC: 7717060. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-020-01100-x.


Comparison of different smartphone cameras to evaluate conjunctival hyperaemia in normal subjects.

Otero C, Garcia-Porta N, Tabernero J, Pardhan S Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):1339.

PMID: 30718684 PMC: 6362079. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37925-5.


[Electronic aids for the visually impaired].

Rohrschneider K Ophthalmologe. 2017; 115(7):546-547.

PMID: 29242984 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0632-6.


References
1.
Ducut E, Liu F, Fontelo P . The cost of being wireless: a usage analysis of the 'PubMed for Handhelds' portal at the point-of-care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008; :936. View

2.
Gandsas A, McIntire K, Park A . Live broadcast of laparoscopic surgery to handheld computers. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(6):997-1000. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8282-y. View

3.
Kampmeier J, Rau T, Liebhardt H, Fegert J, Lang G . [Adoption of OSCE Examination Procedures in Ophthalmology]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010; 228(6):550-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245519. View

4.
Lobach D, Waters M, Keatts S, Kimrey K, Caldwell J, Rafferty W . Integrating direct electronic collection of data from patients into the process of care for eye care professionals. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2010:457-61. PMC: 3041347. View

5.
Kawasaki S, Ito S, Satoh S, Mori Y, Saito T, Fukushima H . Use of telemedicine in periodic screening of diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health. 2003; 9(3):235-9. DOI: 10.1089/153056203322502614. View