» Articles » PMID: 22273057

Measuring Preferred Role Orientations for Patients and Providers in Veterans Administration and University General Medicine Clinics

Overview
Journal Patient
Specialty Health Services
Date 2012 Jan 26
PMID 22273057
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Congruence between patients' and providers' preferred healthcare role orientations has been shown to be important for improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Thus, it is important to know how different patient and provider populations might vary in preferred role orientations.

Objective: To measure the range of role orientation preferences among patients and providers in two different general medicine clinic populations.

Methods: Role orientation preferences of patients (n = 319) and providers (n = 151) in six Veterans Administration (VA) primary care clinics and two university-based primary care clinics were measured in a cross sectional survey using the 9-item Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) sharing subscale among patients and providers.

Results: VA patients had lower mean PPOS scores (i.e. more provider-centered role preference) than the university clinic patients (31.2 vs 39.7, respectively; p < 0.001). The difference remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, and education. VA and university clinic providers had similar mean PPOS scores (41.5 vs 42.6, respectively; p = 0.27). Greater differences were found in mean PPOS scores between VA patients and their providers (31.2 vs 41.5, respectively; p < 0.001) than university clinic patients and their providers (39.7 vs 42.6, respectively; p = 0.12).

Conclusions: VA patients reported preferences for a more provider-centered role than university clinic patients and there was greater mean difference in preferred role orientations between VA patients and their providers than between university clinic patients and their providers. Differences in preferred role orientations by patients and providers should be considered when designing clinical initiatives and research to improve patient care.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Patient Activation Interventions With or Without Financial Incentives to Promote Prescribing of Thiazides and Hypertension Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kaboli P, Howren M, Ishani A, Carter B, Christensen A, Vander Weg M JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 1(8):e185017.

PMID: 30646291 PMC: 6324341. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5017.

References
1.
Krupat E, Hsu J, Irish J, Schmittdiel J, Selby J . Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care. 2004; 10(11 Pt 1):814-22. View

2.
Street Jr R, Krupat E, Bell R, Kravitz R, Haidet P . Beliefs about control in the physician-patient relationship: effect on communication in medical encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18(8):609-16. PMC: 1494906. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20749.x. View

3.
Jahng K, Martin L, Golin C, DiMatteo M . Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57(3):308-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.006. View

4.
Borowsky S, Cowper D . Dual use of VA and non-VA primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14(5):274-80. PMC: 1496577. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00335.x. View

5.
Bergeson S, Dean J . A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA. 2006; 296(23):2848-51. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2848. View