» Articles » PMID: 22272334

The Weaker Sex? The Propensity for Male-biased Piglet Mortality

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jan 25
PMID 22272334
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For the most part solutions to farm animal welfare issues, such as piglet mortality, are likely to lie within the scientific disciplines of environmental design and genetic selection, however understanding the ecological basis of some of the complex dynamics observed between parent and offspring could make a valuable contribution. One interesting, and often discussed, aspect of mortality is the propensity for it to be sex-biased. This study investigated whether known physiological and behavioural indicators of piglet survival differed between the sexes and whether life history strategies (often reported in wild or feral populations) relating to parental investment were being displayed in a domestic population of pigs. Sex ratio (proportion of males (males/males+females)) at birth was 0.54 and sex allocation (maternal investment measured as piglet birth weight/litter weight) was statistically significantly male-biased at 0.55 (t(35) = 2.51 P = 0.017), suggesting that sows invested more in sons than daughters during gestation. Despite this investment in birth weight, a known survival indicator, total pre-weaning male mortality was statistically significantly higher than female mortality (12% vs. 7% respectively z = 2.06 P = 0.040). Males tended to suffer from crushing by the sow more than females and statistically significantly more males died from disease-related causes. Although males were born on average heavier, with higher body mass index and ponderal index, these differences were not sustained. In addition male piglets showed impaired thermoregulation compared to females. These results suggest male-biased mortality exists despite greater initial maternal investment, and therefore reflects the greater susceptibility of this sex to causal mortality factors. Life history strategies are being displayed by a domestic population of pigs with sows in this study displaying a form of parental optimism by allocating greater resources at birth to males and providing an over-supply of this more vulnerable sex in expectation of sex-biased mortality.

Citing Articles

Effects of dietary phytase and sex on behavioral responses in castrated male and female piglets.

Zigovski G, Hernandez E, Bez I, Nakamura G, Catoia M, Buzatto A Vet Res Commun. 2025; 49(3):139.

PMID: 40080306 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-025-10714-y.


Effects of silymarin supplementation in late pregnancy and lactation on reproductive performance, colostrum quality, blood biochemistry and inflammation levels of sows.

Cong G, Xia S, Liu C, Li J, Hung I, Zhang L Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025; 57(2):66.

PMID: 39960637 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-025-04320-y.


Utero-placental adaptations in response to intrauterine growth restriction in swine.

Clemens M, Tyree M, Stenhouse C Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2025; 91:106917.

PMID: 39862557 PMC: 11850212. DOI: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2025.106917.


Effects of guanidine acetic acid supplementation from gestation to lactation on reproductive performance, colostrum quality, blood biochemistry, and intestinal microflora diversity of sows.

Cong G, Xia S, Liu C, Li J, Hung I Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1476328.

PMID: 39507217 PMC: 11537982. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1476328.


Thriving or Striving: Comparing Intra-Uterine Growth Restricted, Low Birth Weight and Normal Birth Weight Piglets within the First 24 Hours.

Loyens M, Van Bockstal L, Prims S, Van Cruchten S, Van Ginneken C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272295 PMC: 11394454. DOI: 10.3390/ani14172508.


References
1.
Held S, Baumgartner J, Kilbride A, Byrne R, Mendl M . Foraging behaviour in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa): remembering and prioritizing food sites of different value. Anim Cogn. 2005; 8(2):114-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0242-y. View

2.
Rutkowska J, Koskela E, Mappes T, Speakman J . A trade-off between current and future sex allocation revealed by maternal energy budget in a small mammal. Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 278(1720):2962-9. PMC: 3151707. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2654. View

3.
Chen Z, Dziuk P . Influence of initial length of uterus per embryo and gestation stage on prenatal survival, development, and sex ratio in the pig. J Anim Sci. 1993; 71(7):1895-901. DOI: 10.2527/1993.7171895x. View

4.
Forbes , Mock . Parental Optimism and Progeny Choice: When is Screening for Offspring Quality Affordable. J Theor Biol. 1998; 192(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0596. View

5.
Mendl , Broom , Zanella . Multiple mechanisms may affect birth sex ratio in domestic pigs. Anim Behav. 1998; 55(3):773-6. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0678. View