» Articles » PMID: 22271928

The Cost-effectiveness of a School-based Smoking Prevention Program in India

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2012 Jan 25
PMID 22271928
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intervention programs aimed at preventing tobacco use among youth have been shown to be effective in curbing tobacco use onset and progression. However, the effects of even very successful tobacco prevention programs may not always impress policy-makers and lay audiences. Economic analysis potentially strengthens the case. In this paper, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a youth tobacco use prevention program which has been translated and implemented in India, a developing country. Although programs like these are inexpensive to implement in the USA, they are even less expensive in India due to low labor costs. Our results show that the costs per quality-adjusted life-year added, due to averted smoking, was $2057, even without including averted medical costs. If we ignore student time, cost-effectiveness improves by roughly 10%. To put the cost-effectiveness of this smoking prevention program into context, it is over 24 times more cost-effective than dialysis in the USA, which costs $50,000 for a life-year.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review of Economic Evidence of Cardiovascular Interventions in India.

Abidi S, Nair A, Ahuja R, Dwivedi S, Talegaonkar S Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024; 20(6):e300724232473.

PMID: 39082180 PMC: 11440333. DOI: 10.2174/011573403X309363240730095253.


The cost-effectiveness of school-based interventions for chronic diseases: a systematic review.

Lin G, Werner K, Alqunaiebet A, Hamza M, Alkanhal N, Alsukait R Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024; 22(1):26.

PMID: 38605333 PMC: 11008027. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00511-w.


Comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence for health policy decisions in India.

Shah K, Singh M, Kotwani P, Tyagi K, Pandya A, Saha S Front Public Health. 2022; 10:831254.

PMID: 36311623 PMC: 9606776. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831254.


The state of cost-utility analysis in India: A systematic review.

Khurana T, Gupta A, Rathi H Perspect Clin Res. 2021; 12(4):179-183.

PMID: 34760643 PMC: 8525785. DOI: 10.4103/picr.PICR_256_20.


Local Marketing of a National Texting-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Is It Cost Effective?.

Brown 3rd H, Patel U, Seidel S, LeMaistre A, Wilson K Front Public Health. 2020; 8:116.

PMID: 32457862 PMC: 7221146. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00116.


References
1.
Dino G, Horn K, Abdulkadri A, Kalsekar I, Branstetter S . Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Not On Tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation. Prev Sci. 2008; 9(1):38-46. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-008-0082-0. View

2.
Cromwell J, Bartosch W, Fiore M, Hasselblad V, Baker T . Cost-effectiveness of the clinical practice recommendations in the AHCPR guideline for smoking cessation. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. JAMA. 1997; 278(21):1759-66. View

3.
Wang L, Crossett L, Lowry R, Sussman S, Dent C . Cost-effectiveness of a school-based tobacco-use prevention program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155(9):1043-50. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.9.1043. View

4.
Li P, Chow K . The cost barrier to peritoneal dialysis in the developing world--an Asian perspective. Perit Dial Int. 2002; 21 Suppl 3:S307-13. View

5.
Perry C, Stigler M, Arora M, Reddy K . Preventing tobacco use among young people in India: Project MYTRI. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(5):899-906. PMC: 2667859. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.145433. View