» Articles » PMID: 22267158

Generic Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation: a Canadian Perspective

Overview
Journal Transplantation
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2012 Jan 24
PMID 22267158
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The introduction of generic immunosuppressant medications may present an opportunity for cost savings in solid organ transplantation if equivalent clinical outcomes to the branded counterparts can be achieved. An interprofessional working group of the Canadian Society of Transplantation was established to develop recommendations on the use of generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) based on a review of the available data. Under current Health Canada licensing requirements, a demonstration of bioequivalence with the branded formulation in healthy volunteers allows for bridging of clinical data. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus are designated as "critical dose drugs" and are held to stricter criteria. However, whether this provides sufficient guarantee of therapeutic equivalence in SOTR remains controversial, and failure to maintain an appropriate balance of immunosuppression may have serious consequences, including rejection, graft loss, and death. Published evidence supporting therapeutic equivalence of generic formulations in SOTR is lacking. Moreover, in the setting of multiple generic formulations the potential for uncontrolled product switching is a major concern, since generic preparations are not required to demonstrate bioequivalence with each other. Although close monitoring is recommended with any change in formulation, drug product switches are likely to occur without prescriber knowledge and may pose a significant patient safety risk. The advent of generic immunosuppression will require new practices including more frequent therapeutic drug and clinical monitoring, and increased patient education. The additional workload placed on transplant centers without additional funding will create challenges and could ultimately jeopardize patient outcomes. Until more robust clinical data are available and adequate regulatory safeguards are instituted, caution in the use of generic immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation is warranted.

Citing Articles

Immunosuppression with Generics in Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Real-World Evidence Study.

Finocchietti M, Marino M, Rosa A, Bellini A, Masiero L, Cardillo M Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024; 18:53-69.

PMID: 38229916 PMC: 10790661. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S431121.


From Animal Models to Clinical Trials: The Potential of Antimicrobials in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment.

Raghib M, Bernitsas E Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 38002068 PMC: 10668955. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11113069.


Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Drugs with a Narrow Therapeutic Index: Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Once-Daily Tacrolimus.

Gantar K, Skerget K, Mochkin I, Bajc A Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020; 12:151-160.

PMID: 32982466 PMC: 7489937. DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S256455.


Generic Tacrolimus (Tacrobell) Shows Comparable Outcomes to Brand-Name Tacrolimus in the Long-Term Period After Adult Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

Kim J, Joh J, Choi G, Lee S Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020; 13:4431-4438.

PMID: 32021085 PMC: 6948198. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S229114.


Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis on biopsy-proven acute rejection and bioequivalence.

Kahn J, Pregartner G, Schemmer P Transpl Int. 2020; 33(4):356-372.

PMID: 31971288 PMC: 7154701. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13581.