» Articles » PMID: 22264277

Meta-analyses and Forest Plots Using a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet: Step-by-step Guide Focusing on Descriptive Data Analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Jan 24
PMID 22264277
Citations 251
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Meta-analyses are necessary to synthesize data obtained from primary research, and in many situations reviews of observational studies are the only available alternative. General purpose statistical packages can meta-analyze data, but usually require external macros or coding. Commercial specialist software is available, but may be expensive and focused in a particular type of primary data. Most available softwares have limitations in dealing with descriptive data, and the graphical display of summary statistics such as incidence and prevalence is unsatisfactory. Analyses can be conducted using Microsoft Excel, but there was no previous guide available.

Findings: We constructed a step-by-step guide to perform a meta-analysis in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, using either fixed-effect or random-effects models. We have also developed a second spreadsheet capable of producing customized forest plots.

Conclusions: It is possible to conduct a meta-analysis using only Microsoft Excel. More important, to our knowledge this is the first description of a method for producing a statistically adequate but graphically appealing forest plot summarizing descriptive data, using widely available software.

Citing Articles

Systematic review and meta-analysis on fully automated digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.

Hwang J, Lee G, Woo J, Kim S, Kwon J NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):157.

PMID: 40075149 PMC: 11903857. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01514-4.


Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence by Body Area Among Nurses in Europe: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gorce P, Jacquier-Bret J J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39982306 PMC: 11843921. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010066.


Gaps, challenges and opportunities towards achieving the 95-95-95 targets in Cameroon: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Ngoufack Jagni Semengue E, N K A A, Tueguem P, Kae C, Molimbou E, Forgwei L PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0317850.

PMID: 39928611 PMC: 11809780. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317850.


Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression among Nurses during the early phase of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

Jatt K, Sivarajan Froelicher E, Pienaar A, Dhamani K Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(2):622-629.

PMID: 39926693 PMC: 11803779. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.2.10828.


Clinical features of mesotherapy-associated non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections: A systematic review.

Singsing M, Duncan S, Vachon M, Goff H Int J Womens Dermatol. 2025; 8(4):e059.

PMID: 39916988 PMC: 11801139. DOI: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000059.


References
1.
Stroup D, Berlin J, Morton S, Olkin I, Williamson G, Rennie D . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283(15):2008-12. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. View

2.
Schriger D, Altman D, Vetter J, Heafner T, Moher D . Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39(2):421-9. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp370. View

3.
Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):557-60. PMC: 192859. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. View

4.
Wallace B, Schmid C, Lau J, Trikalinos T . Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:80. PMC: 2795760. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-80. View

5.
Bax L, Yu L, Ikeda N, Tsuruta H, Moons K . Development and validation of MIX: comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:50. PMC: 1626481. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-50. View