Estimating the Prevalence of Infertility in Canada

Overview

Journal Hum Reprod

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2012 Jan 20

PMID 22258658

Citations 87

Authors

Tracey Bushnik

Jocelynn L Cook

A Albert Yuzpe

Suzanne Tough

John Collins

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Over the past 10 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of assisted reproductive technologies in Canada, however, little is known about the overall prevalence of infertility in the population. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of current infertility in Canada according to three definitions of the risk of conception.

Methods: Data from the infertility component of the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed for married and common-law couples with a female partner aged 18-44. The three definitions of the risk of conception were derived sequentially starting with birth control use in the previous 12 months, adding reported sexual intercourse in the previous 12 months, then pregnancy intent. Prevalence and odds ratios of current infertility were estimated by selected characteristics.

Results: Estimates of the prevalence of current infertility ranged from 11.5% (95% CI 10.2, 12.9) to 15.7% (95% CI 14.2, 17.4). Each estimate represented an increase in current infertility prevalence in Canada when compared with previous national estimates. Couples with lower parity (0 or 1 child) had significantly higher odds of experiencing current infertility when the female partner was aged 35-44 years versus 18-34 years. Lower odds of experiencing current infertility were observed for multiparous couples regardless of age group of the female partner, when compared with nulliparous couples.

Conclusions: The present study suggests that the prevalence of current infertility has increased since the last time it was measured in Canada, and is associated with the age of the female partner and parity.

Citing Articles

Exploring parenthood intentions and perceptions of infertility and assisted reproductive technology among 2SLGBTQIA + young adults in Ontario, Canada: a mixed methods study.

Ennis C, Fernando N, Phillips K J Health Popul Nutr. 2025; 44(1):13.

PMID: 39827358 PMC: 11743041. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00729-7.

Prediction of Post Traumatic Epilepsy Using MR-Based Imaging Markers.

Akrami H, Cui W, Kim P, Heck C, Irimia A, Jerbi K Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(17):e70075.

PMID: 39560185 PMC: 11574740. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70075.

Citrate Promotes Nitric Oxide Production during Human Sperm Capacitation.

Loggia D, OFlaherty C Antioxidants (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39199131 PMC: 11352016. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13080885.

Pilot trial of a new self-directed psychological intervention for infertility-related distress.

Poulter M, Balsom A, Gordon J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):111.

PMID: 39152484 PMC: 11328509. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01535-y.

Factors associated with oocyte recovery rates during in-vitro fertilization among Nigerian women.

Mohammed-Durosinlorun A, Wada I Pan Afr Med J. 2024; 47:190.

PMID: 39092016 PMC: 11293478. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.190.38674.

References

Marchbanks P, Peterson H, Rubin G, Wingo P . Research on infertility: definition makes a difference. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 130(2):259-67. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115332. View

Shields M, Tremblay M, Laviolette M, Craig C, Janssen I, Connor Gorber S . Fitness of Canadian adults: results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2010; 21(1):21-35. View

Gougeon A . The biological aspects of risks of infertility due to age: the female side. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2006; 53 Spec No 2:2S37-45. View

Chambers G, Sullivan E, Ishihara O, Chapman M, Adamson G . The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(6):2281-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029. View

Allen V, Wilson R, Cheung A . RETIRED: Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006; 28(3):220-233. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32112-0. View

Macaluso M, Wright-Schnapp T, Chandra A, Johnson R, Satterwhite C, Pulver A . A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management. Fertil Steril. 2008; 93(1):16.e1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.046. View

Looman C, Alsbach H, Habbema J, Te Velde E, KARBAAT J . Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ. 1991; 302(6789):1361-5. PMC: 1670055. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.302.6789.1361. View

Thonneau P, Spira A . Prevalence of infertility: international data and problems of measurement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991; 38(1):43-52. DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90206-z. View

Swanton A, Child T . Reproduction and ovarian ageing. J Br Menopause Soc. 2005; 11(4):126-31. DOI: 10.1258/136218005775544200. View

10.

Grodstein F, Goldman M, Cramer D . Body mass index and ovulatory infertility. Epidemiology. 1994; 5(2):247-50. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199403000-00016. View

11.

Brassard M, Ainmelk Y, Baillargeon J . Basic infertility including polycystic ovary syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 2008; 92(5):1163-92, xi. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.04.008. View

12.

Sciarra J . Infertility: an international health problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994; 46(2):155-63. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90230-5. View

13.

Webb S, Holman D . A survey of infertility, surgical sterility and associated reproductive disability in Perth, Western Australia. Aust J Public Health. 1992; 16(4):376-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1992.tb00084.x. View

14.

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins J, Nygren K . International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6):1506-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. View

15.

Herbert D, Lucke J, Dobson A . Infertility, medical advice and treatment with fertility hormones and/or in vitro fertilisation: a population perspective from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009; 33(4):358-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00408.x. View

16.

Larsen U . Research on infertility: which definition should we use?. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(4):846-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.033. View

17.

Kelly-Weeder S, Cox C . The impact of lifestyle risk factors on female infertility. Women Health. 2007; 44(4):1-23. DOI: 10.1300/j013v44n04_01. View

18.

Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman R . Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment - A review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50(1):8-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01119.x. View

19.

Deonandan R . The public health implications of assisted reproductive technologies. Chronic Dis Can. 2010; 30(4):119-24. View

20.

Bhattacharya S, Porter M, Amalraj E, Templeton A, Hamilton M, Lee A . The epidemiology of infertility in the North East of Scotland. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(12):3096-107. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep287. View