» Articles » PMID: 22258431

Do Infants Have a Sense of Fairness?

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Jan 20
PMID 22258431
Citations 93
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two experiments examined infants' expectations about how an experimenter should distribute resources and rewards to other individuals. In Experiment 1, 19-month-olds expected an experimenter to divide two items equally, as opposed to unequally, between two individuals. The infants held no particular expectation when the individuals were replaced with inanimate objects, or when the experimenter simply removed covers in front of the individuals to reveal the items (instead of distributing them). In Experiment 2, 21-month-olds expected an experimenter to give a reward to each of two individuals when both had worked to complete an assigned chore, but not when one of the individuals had done all the work while the other played. The infants held this expectation only when the experimenter could determine through visual inspection who had worked and who had not. Together, these results provide converging evidence that infants in the 2nd year of life already possess context-sensitive expectations relevant to fairness.

Citing Articles

Psychosocial impacts of post-disaster compensation processes: narrative systematic review.

Brooks S, Rogers M, Wessely S, Patel S, Greenberg N BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):539.

PMID: 39375791 PMC: 11460075. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02025-9.


Social status mediates the propagation of unfairness.

Kang H, Kim J, Kim D, Kim H Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1253831.

PMID: 39315034 PMC: 11417036. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1253831.


Infants expect some degree of positive and negative reciprocity between strangers.

Jin K, Ting F, He Z, Baillargeon R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7742.

PMID: 39231969 PMC: 11375034. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51982-7.


The role of social motivation in sharing and fairness: insights from Williams syndrome.

Foti F, Costanzo F, Fabrizio C, Termine A, Menghini D, Iaquinta T J Neurodev Disord. 2024; 16(1):50.

PMID: 39217324 PMC: 11365235. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-024-09568-3.


The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.

Luo Y, vanMarle K, Groh A Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024; :17456916241262693.

PMID: 39186195 PMC: 11861394. DOI: 10.1177/17456916241262693.


References
1.
Thomson N, Jones E . Children's, adolescents', and young adults' reward allocations to hypothetical siblings and fairness judgments: effects of actor gender, character type, and allocation pattern. J Psychol. 2005; 139(4):349-67. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.139.4.349-368. View

2.
Dupoux E, Jacob P . Universal moral grammar: a critical appraisal. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007; 11(9):373-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.001. View

3.
Mikhail J . Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007; 11(4):143-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007. View

4.
Tsutsu K . [Influences on the amount of the reward: how five-year-old children distribute rewards]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2010; 81(3):201-9. DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.81.201. View

5.
UGUREL-SEMIN R . Moral behavior and moral judgment of children. J Abnorm Psychol. 1952; 47(2 Suppl.):463-74. DOI: 10.1037/h0056970. View