» Articles » PMID: 22253669

Neuro-cognitive Mechanisms of Conscious and Unconscious Visual Perception: From a Plethora of Phenomena to General Principles

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Jan 19
PMID 22253669
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Psychological and neuroscience approaches have promoted much progress in elucidating the cognitive and neural mechanisms that underlie phenomenal visual awareness during the last decades. In this article, we provide an overview of the latest research investigating important phenomena in conscious and unconscious vision. We identify general principles to characterize conscious and unconscious visual perception, which may serve as important building blocks for a unified model to explain the plethora of findings. We argue that in particular the integration of principles from both conscious and unconscious vision is advantageous and provides critical constraints for developing adequate theoretical models. Based on the principles identified in our review, we outline essential components of a unified model of conscious and unconscious visual perception. We propose that awareness refers to consolidated visual representations, which are accessible to the entire brain and therefore globally available. However, visual awareness not only depends on consolidation within the visual system, but is additionally the result of a post-sensory gating process, which is mediated by higher-level cognitive control mechanisms. We further propose that amplification of visual representations by attentional sensitization is not exclusive to the domain of conscious perception, but also applies to visual stimuli, which remain unconscious. Conscious and unconscious processing modes are highly interdependent with influences in both directions. We therefore argue that exactly this interdependence renders a unified model of conscious and unconscious visual perception valuable. Computational modeling jointly with focused experimental research could lead to a better understanding of the plethora of empirical phenomena in consciousness research.

Citing Articles

The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Visual Awareness: Current Evidence, Attempt of a Synthesis and Future Research Directions.

Kiefer M, Kammer T J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):59.

PMID: 39035071 PMC: 11259121. DOI: 10.5334/joc.381.


Subjective and objective measures of visual awareness converge.

Kiefer M, Fruhauf V, Kammer T PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292438.

PMID: 37788260 PMC: 10547206. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292438.


Recognition of Empathy from Synchronization between Brain Activity and Eye Movement.

Zhang J, Park S, Cho A, Whang M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(11).

PMID: 37299888 PMC: 10255460. DOI: 10.3390/s23115162.


Inattentive Perception, Time, and the Incomprehensibility of Consciousness.

Kruger J Front Psychol. 2022; 12:804652.

PMID: 35211055 PMC: 8861428. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.804652.


Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence.

de Gee J, Correa C, Weaver M, Donner T, van Gaal S Cereb Cortex. 2021; 31(7):3565-3578.

PMID: 33822917 PMC: 8196307. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab032.


References
1.
Engel A, Fries P, Konig P, Brecht M, Singer W . Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Conscious Cogn. 1999; 8(2):128-51. DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1999.0389. View

2.
Rees G, Russell C, Frith C, Driver J . Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science. 2000; 286(5449):2504-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2504. View

3.
Michael L, Kiefer M, Niedeggen M . The influence of distracter and target features on distracter induced blindness. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012; 8(1):62-9. PMC: 3303155. DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0103-3. View

4.
Schmidt T . The finger in flight: real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(2):112-8. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00421. View

5.
Dehaene S, Kerszberg M, Changeux J . A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(24):14529-34. PMC: 24407. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529. View