» Articles » PMID: 22249195

Optical Probes and Techniques for O2 Measurement in Live Cells and Tissue

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Jan 18
PMID 22249195
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in the sensing and imaging of molecular oxygen (O(2)) in biological samples containing live cells and tissue. We review recent developments in the measurement of O(2) in such samples by optical means, particularly using the phosphorescence quenching technique. The main types of soluble O(2) sensors are assessed, including small molecule, supramolecular and particle-based structures used as extracellular or intracellular probes in conjunction with different detection modalities and measurement formats. For the different O(2) sensing systems, particular attention is paid to their merits and limitations, analytical performance, general convenience and applicability in specific biological applications. The latter include measurement of O(2) consumption rate, sample oxygenation, sensing of intracellular O(2), metabolic assessment of cells, and O(2) imaging of tissue, vasculature and individual cells. Altogether, this gives the potential user a comprehensive guide for the proper selection of the appropriate optical probe(s) and detection platform to suit their particular biological applications and measurement requirements.

Citing Articles

Blot: Microfluidic Control and Measurement of the Cell-Cell Contact State to Assess Contact-Inhibited ERK Signaling.

Zhang Y, Naguro I, Ryuno H, Herr A Anal Chem. 2024; .

PMID: 39254112 PMC: 11447967. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02936.


Insertable Glucose Sensor Using a Compact and Cost-Effective Phosphorescence Lifetime Imager and Machine Learning.

Goncharov A, Gorocs Z, Pradhan R, Ko B, Ajmal A, Rodriguez A ACS Nano. 2024; 18(34):23365-23379.

PMID: 39137319 PMC: 11363142. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c06527.


Susceptibility of the Different Oxygen-Sensing Probes to Interferences in Respirometric Bacterial Assays with Complex Media.

Zanetti C, Li L, Gaspar R, Santovito E, Elisseeva S, Collins S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(1).

PMID: 38203132 PMC: 10781214. DOI: 10.3390/s24010267.


Physiological oxygen measurements Schrödinger's cat in 3D cell biology.

Gottwald E, Grun C, Nies C, Liebsch G Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1218957.

PMID: 37885450 PMC: 10598749. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1218957.


Biocompatible Phosphorescent O Sensors Based on Ir(III) Complexes for In Vivo Hypoxia Imaging.

Samandarsangari M, Kozina D, Sokolov V, Komarova A, Shirmanova M, Kritchenkov I Biosensors (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37504079 PMC: 10377268. DOI: 10.3390/bios13070680.


References
1.
Mitra S, Foster T . Photochemical oxygen consumption sensitized by a porphyrin phosphorescent probe in two model systems. Biophys J. 2000; 78(5):2597-605. PMC: 1300849. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76804-4. View

2.
Chang J, Wen B, Kazanzides P, Zanzonico P, Finn R, Fichtinger G . A robotic system for 18F-FMISO PET-guided intratumoral pO2 measurements. Med Phys. 2009; 36(11):5301-9. PMC: 2776816. DOI: 10.1118/1.3239491. View

3.
Dunphy I, Vinogradov S, Wilson D . Oxyphor R2 and G2: phosphors for measuring oxygen by oxygen-dependent quenching of phosphorescence. Anal Biochem. 2002; 310(2):191-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2697(02)00384-6. View

4.
Diepart C, Verrax J, Buc Calderon P, Feron O, Jordan B, Gallez B . Comparison of methods for measuring oxygen consumption in tumor cells in vitro. Anal Biochem. 2009; 396(2):250-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.029. View

5.
Lee Y, Smith R, Kopelman R . Nanoparticle PEBBLE sensors in live cells and in vivo. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2010; 2:57-76. PMC: 2809932. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112823. View