» Articles » PMID: 22241005

Contemporary Outcomes of Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in 638 Octogenarians: Insights from an Italian Regional Cardiac Surgery Registry (RERIC)

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Few data exist on contemporary outcomes after conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the elderly. Accordingly, we evaluated contemporary outcomes and identified predictors of reduced survival in a large series of octogenarians undergoing AVR.

Methods: The Regione Emilia Romagna Cardiac Surgery registry (RERIC) database (n = 2 6938) was queried for clinical features, hospital and mid-term outcomes of octogenarians undergoing AVR between 2003 and 2009. Predictors of hospital and mid-term mortality were identified.

Results: The study population consisted of 638 patients. NYHA class III-IV, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, extra-cardiac arteriopathy, mostly exacerbated patients' clinical profile. Mean log-EuroSCORE was 13.0%. Overall hospital mortality and stroke rates were 4.5% and 1.3%, respectively. Other post-operative complications included renal failure (4.9%), intubation time >48 h (3.4%), complete atrio-ventricular block (4.4%). NYHA III-IV (OR = 2.7; CI 95%:1.2-6.7) and CCS III-IV (OR = 3.1; CI 95%:1.1-9.4) emerged as independent predictors of hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. At 6 years, octogenarians' survival rate was similar to the expected survival of the age- and sex-matched regional population. CCS III-IV (HR = 2.1; CI 95%:1.2-4), preoperative creatinine > 2.1 (HR = 2.8; CI 95%:1.4-5.9), extra-cardiac arteriopathy (HR = 1.5; CI 95%:1.1-2.1) and peripheral neurological dysfunction (HR = 3.8; CI 95%:1.4-10.4) emerged as independent risk factors for decreased 6 years' survival.

Conclusions: This study, showing that contemporary outcomes after AVR are excellent, may help to improve treatment decision-making in elderly patients with aortic valve disease.

Citing Articles

Economic Justification Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement.

Jovanovic M, Zivkovic I, Jovanovic M, Bilbija I, Petrovic M, Markovic J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767915 PMC: 9916198. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032553.


Feeding intolerance and risk of poor outcome in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Lin Y, Chen M, Peng Y, Chen Q, Li S, Chen L Br J Nutr. 2021; 126(9):1340-1346.

PMID: 33468265 PMC: 8505710. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521000167.


Does additional coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement in elderly patients affect the early and long-term outcome?.

Formica F, Mariani S, DAlessandro S, Singh G, Di Mauro M, Cerrito M Heart Vessels. 2019; 35(4):487-501.

PMID: 31642980 PMC: 7222122. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01519-6.


Surgical treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis in the modern era - review.

Kwiecien A, Hrapkowicz T, Filipiak K, Przybylski R, Kaczmarczyk M, Kowalczuk A Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018; 15(3):188-195.

PMID: 30310399 PMC: 6180026. DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2018.78445.


Aortic valve disease in the older adult.

Bhatia N, Basra S, Skolnick A, Wenger N J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017; 13(12):941-944.

PMID: 28321235 PMC: 5351823. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.12.004.