Contemporary Outcomes of Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in 638 Octogenarians: Insights from an Italian Regional Cardiac Surgery Registry (RERIC)
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: Few data exist on contemporary outcomes after conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the elderly. Accordingly, we evaluated contemporary outcomes and identified predictors of reduced survival in a large series of octogenarians undergoing AVR.
Methods: The Regione Emilia Romagna Cardiac Surgery registry (RERIC) database (n = 2 6938) was queried for clinical features, hospital and mid-term outcomes of octogenarians undergoing AVR between 2003 and 2009. Predictors of hospital and mid-term mortality were identified.
Results: The study population consisted of 638 patients. NYHA class III-IV, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, extra-cardiac arteriopathy, mostly exacerbated patients' clinical profile. Mean log-EuroSCORE was 13.0%. Overall hospital mortality and stroke rates were 4.5% and 1.3%, respectively. Other post-operative complications included renal failure (4.9%), intubation time >48 h (3.4%), complete atrio-ventricular block (4.4%). NYHA III-IV (OR = 2.7; CI 95%:1.2-6.7) and CCS III-IV (OR = 3.1; CI 95%:1.1-9.4) emerged as independent predictors of hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. At 6 years, octogenarians' survival rate was similar to the expected survival of the age- and sex-matched regional population. CCS III-IV (HR = 2.1; CI 95%:1.2-4), preoperative creatinine > 2.1 (HR = 2.8; CI 95%:1.4-5.9), extra-cardiac arteriopathy (HR = 1.5; CI 95%:1.1-2.1) and peripheral neurological dysfunction (HR = 3.8; CI 95%:1.4-10.4) emerged as independent risk factors for decreased 6 years' survival.
Conclusions: This study, showing that contemporary outcomes after AVR are excellent, may help to improve treatment decision-making in elderly patients with aortic valve disease.
Economic Justification Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement.
Jovanovic M, Zivkovic I, Jovanovic M, Bilbija I, Petrovic M, Markovic J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).
PMID: 36767915 PMC: 9916198. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032553.
Feeding intolerance and risk of poor outcome in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.
Lin Y, Chen M, Peng Y, Chen Q, Li S, Chen L Br J Nutr. 2021; 126(9):1340-1346.
PMID: 33468265 PMC: 8505710. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521000167.
Formica F, Mariani S, DAlessandro S, Singh G, Di Mauro M, Cerrito M Heart Vessels. 2019; 35(4):487-501.
PMID: 31642980 PMC: 7222122. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01519-6.
Surgical treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis in the modern era - review.
Kwiecien A, Hrapkowicz T, Filipiak K, Przybylski R, Kaczmarczyk M, Kowalczuk A Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018; 15(3):188-195.
PMID: 30310399 PMC: 6180026. DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2018.78445.
Aortic valve disease in the older adult.
Bhatia N, Basra S, Skolnick A, Wenger N J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017; 13(12):941-944.
PMID: 28321235 PMC: 5351823. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.12.004.