» Articles » PMID: 22238684

How Noisy Does a Noisy Miner Have to Be? Amplitude Adjustments of Alarm Calls in an Avian Urban 'adapter'

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jan 13
PMID 22238684
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Urban environments generate constant loud noise, which creates a formidable challenge for many animals relying on acoustic communication. Some birds make vocal adjustments that reduce auditory masking by altering, for example, the frequency (kHz) or timing of vocalizations. Another adjustment, well documented for birds under laboratory and natural field conditions, is a noise level-dependent change in sound signal amplitude (the 'Lombard effect'). To date, however, field research on amplitude adjustments in urban environments has focused exclusively on bird song.

Methods: We investigated amplitude regulation of alarm calls using, as our model, a successful urban 'adapter' species, the Noisy miner, Manorina melanocephala. We compared several different alarm calls under contrasting noise conditions.

Results: Individuals at noisier locations (arterial roads) alarm called significantly more loudly than those at quieter locations (residential streets). Other mechanisms known to improve sound signal transmission in 'noise', namely use of higher perches and in-flight calling, did not differ between site types. Intriguingly, the observed preferential use of different alarm calls by Noisy miners inhabiting arterial roads and residential streets was unlikely to have constituted a vocal modification made in response to sound-masking in the urban environment because the calls involved fell within the main frequency range of background anthropogenic noise.

Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that a species, which has the ability to adjust the amplitude of its signals, might have a 'natural' advantage in noisy urban environments.

Citing Articles

Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife.

Nelson-Olivieri J, Layden T, Antunez E, Khalighifar A, Lasky M, Laverty T Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 8(1):163-174.

PMID: 37985897 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02257-9.


Do the Calls of a Bird, the Noisy Miner (Manorina melanocephala), Need Adjustment for Efficient Communication in Urban Anthropogenic Noise?.

Lowry H, Lill A, Wong B Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(3).

PMID: 30917544 PMC: 6466032. DOI: 10.3390/ani9030118.


Noisy anthropogenic infrastructure interferes with alarm responses in Savannah sparrows ().

Antze B, Koper N R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(5):172168.

PMID: 29892404 PMC: 5990837. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172168.


White-crowned sparrow males show immediate flexibility in song amplitude but not in song minimum frequency in response to changes in noise levels in the field.

Derryberry E, Gentry K, Derryberry G, Phillips J, Danner R, Danner J Ecol Evol. 2017; 7(13):4991-5001.

PMID: 28690825 PMC: 5496534. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3037.

References
1.
Oberweger K, Goller F . The metabolic cost of birdsong production. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 19):3379-88. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3379. View

2.
Manabe K, Sadr E, Dooling R . Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103(2):1190-8. DOI: 10.1121/1.421227. View

3.
Nemeth E, Brumm H . Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive?. Am Nat. 2010; 176(4):465-75. DOI: 10.1086/656275. View

4.
Luther D, Baptista L . Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 277(1680):469-73. PMC: 2842653. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1571. View

5.
Brumm H, Voss K, Kollmer I, Todt D . Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol. 2003; 207(Pt 3):443-8. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00768. View