» Articles » PMID: 22232344

Outcome Measures Used in Pediatric Stroke Studies: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Arch Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Jan 11
PMID 22232344
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because no gold-standard outcome measure or measures exist to allow comparison of pediatric stroke study outcomes in clinical trials, we designed a systematic review of the literature to survey the current use of pediatric stroke outcome measures. Studies that used at least 1 standardized measure to assess the outcome of children with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, from full-term newborn to age 18 years, were included. Although 34 studies were included, an additional 36 studies could not be included because ad hoc, author-generated outcome measures were used. Excluding those measures in neuropsychological batteries, 38 unique outcome measures were used. The Wechsler Intelligence Scales, Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure, and Bayley Scales of Infant Development were among the most used, but 79% of outcome measures were used by no more than 2 studies. Although many measures used have been validated for use in children with other medical conditions or for adults with stroke, only 1 measure has been specifically validated for use in pediatric ischemic stroke. To maximize comparability of future clinical trial results, agreement regarding a preferred pediatric stroke outcome scale or battery of measures is paramount; these measures should be reliable, responsive to change, and specifically validated for use in children with stroke.

Citing Articles

Neurococcidiomycosis in children with hydrocephalus: assessment of functional outcome, quality of life and survival in relation to neuroimaging findings.

De la Cerda-Vargas M, Candelas-Rangel J, Navarro-Dominguez P, Sandoval-Bonilla B, Meza-Mata E, Munoz-Hernandez M Childs Nerv Syst. 2023; 40(2):303-319.

PMID: 37819508 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06166-x.


Outcome measures in neurosurgery: Is a unified approach better? A literature review.

Algburi H, Ismail M, Mallah S, Alduraibi L, Albairmani S, Abdulameer A Surg Neurol Int. 2023; 14:61.

PMID: 36895248 PMC: 9990809. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_949_2022.


Consensus-Based Evaluation of Outcome Measures in Pediatric Stroke Care: A Toolkit.

Feldman S, Beslow L, Felling R, Malone L, Waak M, Fraser S Pediatr Neurol. 2023; 141:118-132.

PMID: 36812698 PMC: 10042484. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.01.009.


Roadmap for the Assessment and Management of Outcomes in Pediatric Stroke.

Felling R, Jordan L, Mrakotsky C, deVeber G, Peterson R, Mineyko A Pediatr Neurol. 2023; 141:93-100.

PMID: 36805967 PMC: 11439373. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.01.008.


Influence of socioeconomic status on cognitive outcome after childhood arterial ischemic stroke.

Bartha-Doering L, Gleiss A, Knaus S, Schmook M, Seidl R Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020; 63(4):465-471.

PMID: 33336807 PMC: 7986130. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14779.


References
1.
Saver J, Filip B, Hamilton S, Yanes A, Craig S, Cho M . Improving the reliability of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice: the Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA). Stroke. 2010; 41(5):992-5. PMC: 2930146. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571364. View

2.
FRANKENBURG W, DODDS J . The Denver developmental screening test. J Pediatr. 1967; 71(2):181-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(67)80070-2. View

3.
Thissen D, Varni J, Stucky B, Liu Y, Irwin D, DeWalt D . Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS). Qual Life Res. 2011; 20(9):1497-505. PMC: 3196830. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9874-y. View

4.
Hobart J, Cano S, Thompson A . Effect sizes can be misleading: is it time to change the way we measure change?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81(9):1044-8. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.201392. View

5.
Jennett B, Bond M . Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975; 1(7905):480-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5. View