» Articles » PMID: 22230363

Trends in Incidence and Detection of Advanced Breast Cancer at Biennial Screening Mammography in The Netherlands: a Population Based Study

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Jan 11
PMID 22230363
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aims of this study were to determine trends in the incidence of advanced breast cancer at screening mammography and the potential of screening to reduce it.

Methods: We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening mammograms of 85,274 women aged 50-75 years, who underwent biennial screening at a Dutch breast screening region in the period 1997-2008. Two screening radiologists reviewed the screening mammograms of all advanced screen detected and advanced interval cancers and determined whether the advanced cancer (tumor > 20 mm and/or lymph node positive tumor) had been visible at a previous screen. Interval cancers were breast cancers diagnosed in women after a negative screening examination (defined as no recommendation for referral) and before any subsequent screen. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between women with advanced cancer and women with non-advanced cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ.

Results: A total of 1,771 screen detected cancers and 669 interval cancers were diagnosed in 2,440 women. Rates of advanced cancer remained stable over the 12-year period; the incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers fluctuated between 1.5 - 1.9 per 1,000 screened women (mean 1.6 per 1,000) and of advanced interval cancers between 0.8 - 1.6 per 1,000 screened women (mean 1.2 per 1,000). Of the 570 advanced screen-detected cancers, 106 (18.6%) were detected at initial screening; 265 (46.5%) cancers detected at subsequent screening had been radiologically occult at the previous screening mammogram, 88 (15.4%) had shown a minimal sign, and 111 (19.5%) had been missed. Corresponding figures for advanced interval cancers were 50.9% (216/424), 24.3% (103/424) and 25.1% (105/424), respectively. At multivariate analysis, women with a ≥ 30 months interval between the latest two screens had an increased risk of screen-detected advanced breast cancer (OR 1.63, 95%CI: 1.07-2.48) and hormone replacement therapy increased the risk of advanced disease among interval cancers (OR 3.04, 95%CI: 1.22-7.53).

Conclusion: We observed no decline in the risk of advanced breast cancer during 12 years of biennial screening mammography. The majority of these cancers could not have been prevented through earlier detection at screening.

Citing Articles

Results of a worldwide survey on the currently used histopathological diagnostic criteria for invasive lobular breast cancer.

De Schepper M, Vincent-Salomon A, Christgen M, Van Baelen K, Richard F, Tsuda H Mod Pathol. 2022; 35(12):1812-1820.

PMID: 35922548 PMC: 9708574. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01135-2.


Breast Cancer Screening Program in Lithuania: Interval Cancers and Program Sensitivity After 7 Years of Mammography Screening.

Steponaviciene L, Vincerzevskiene I, Briediene R, Urbonas V, Vanseviciute-Petkeviciene R, Smailyte G Cancer Control. 2019; 26(1):1073274819874122.

PMID: 31502471 PMC: 6755864. DOI: 10.1177/1073274819874122.


Trends in Breast Cancer Incidence and Stage Distribution Before and During the Introduction of the Mammography Screening Program in Lithuania.

Steponaviciene L, Briediene R, Vanseviciute R, Smailyte G Cancer Control. 2019; 26(1):1073274818821096.

PMID: 30808202 PMC: 6327347. DOI: 10.1177/1073274818821096.


The impact of mammography screening programmes on incidence of advanced breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.

Broeders M, Allgood P, Duffy S, Hofvind S, Nagtegaal I, Paci E BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):860.

PMID: 30176813 PMC: 6122725. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4666-1.


Effectiveness of and overdiagnosis from mammography screening in the Netherlands: population based study.

Autier P, Boniol M, Koechlin A, Pizot C, Boniol M BMJ. 2017; 359:j5224.

PMID: 29208760 PMC: 5712859. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j5224.


References
1.
White E, Miglioretti D, Yankaskas B, Geller B, Rosenberg R, Kerlikowske K . Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96(24):1832-9. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh337. View

2.
Maaskant A, van de Poll-Franse L, Voogd A, Coebergh J, Tutein Nolthenius-Puylaert M, Nieuwenhuijzen G . Stage migration due to introduction of the sentinel node procedure: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 113(1):173-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9913-8. View

3.
. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(10):716-26, W-236. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008. View

4.
Autier P, Boniol M, Middleton R, Dore J, Hery C, Zheng T . Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22(8):1726-35. PMC: 3144633. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq633. View

5.
Burrell H, Sibbering D, Wilson A, Pinder S, Evans A, Yeoman L . Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology. 1996; 199(3):811-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8638010. View