» Articles » PMID: 22228911

Cognitive Function, Numeracy and Retirement Saving Trajectories

Overview
Journal Econ J (London)
Date 2012 Jan 10
PMID 22228911
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which cognitive abilities relate to differences in trajectories for key economic outcomes as individuals move towards and through their retirement. We look at whether differences in baseline numeracy (measured in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing in 2002) and broader cognitive ability predict the subsequent trajectories of outcomes such as wealth, retirement income and key dimensions of retirement expectations. Those with lower numeracy are shown to have different wealth trajectories both pre- and post-retirement than their more numerate counterparts, but the distributions of retirement expectations and net replacement rates are similar across numeracy groups.

Citing Articles

What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?.

Chandra A, Coile C, Mommaerts C J Econ Lit. 2025; 61(2):428-470.

PMID: 39917255 PMC: 11801801. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20211660.


Navigating Time-Inconsistent Behavior: The Influence of Financial Knowledge, Behavior, and Attitude on Hyperbolic Discounting.

Bawalle A, Lal S, Nguyen T, Rahim Khan M, Kadoya Y Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39594294 PMC: 11591072. DOI: 10.3390/bs14110994.


Understanding the functional form of the relationship between childhood cognitive ability and adult financial well-being.

Gladstone J, Barrett J PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0285199.

PMID: 37285329 PMC: 10246798. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285199.


Improving Debt Literacy by 2/3 Through Four Simple Infographics Requires Numeracy and Not Focusing on Negatives of Debt.

Porzak R, Cwynar A, Cwynar W Front Psychol. 2021; 12:621312.

PMID: 33841252 PMC: 8032938. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621312.


Discount rate heterogeneity among older households: a puzzle?.

Bozio A, Laroque G, ODea C J Popul Econ. 2020; 30(2):647-680.

PMID: 32269426 PMC: 7115087. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-016-0623-y.


References
1.
Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith J . Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA. 2006; 295(17):2037-45. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2037. View

2.
Banks J, Muriel A, Smith J . Attrition and health in ageing studies: Evidence from ELSA and HRS. Longit Life Course Stud. 2013; 2(2). PMC: 3872999. DOI: 10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115. View

3.
Burks S, Carpenter J, Goette L, Rustichini A . Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(19):7745-50. PMC: 2683075. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812360106. View

4.
Peters E, Vastfjall D, Slovic P, Mertz C, Mazzocco K, Dickert S . Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x. View

5.
Benjamin D, Brown S, Shapiro J . WHO IS 'BEHAVIORAL'? COGNITIVE ABILITY AND ANOMALOUS PREFERENCES. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2018; 11(6):1231-1255. PMC: 6289538. DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12055. View