Systems Science Methods in Public Health: Dynamics, Networks, and Agents

Overview

Journal Annu Rev Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2012 Jan 10

PMID 22224885

Citations 247

Authors

Douglas A Luke

Katherine A Stamatakis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Complex systems abound in public health. Complex systems are made up of heterogeneous elements that interact with one another, have emergent properties that are not explained by understanding the individual elements of the system, persist over time, and adapt to changing circumstances. Public health is starting to use results from systems science studies to shape practice and policy, for example in preparing for global pandemics. However, systems science study designs and analytic methods remain underutilized and are not widely featured in public health curricula or training. In this review we present an argument for the utility of systems science methods in public health, introduce three important systems science methods (system dynamics, network analysis, and agent-based modeling), and provide three case studies in which these methods have been used to answer important public health science questions in the areas of infectious disease, tobacco control, and obesity.

Citing Articles

Modelling epidemiological and economics processes - the case of cervical cancer.

Taeger F, Mende L, Flessa S Health Econ Rev. 2025; 15(1):13.

PMID: 39985694 PMC: 11846406. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1.

A global framework for integrating public health into wellbeing: why a public wellbeing system is needed.

Lippai L, Tarko K, Tanyi A, Kollanyi Z, Arapovics M, Vitrai J Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1454470.

PMID: 39980909 PMC: 11841494. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1454470.

Participatory Modeling for High Complexity, Multi-System Issues: Challenges and Recommendations for Balancing Qualitative Understanding and Quantitative Questions.

Deutsch A, Frerichs L, Perry M, Jalali M Syst Dyn Rev. 2025; 40(4.

PMID: 39831133 PMC: 11741230. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1765.

Adaptive behaviour during epidemics: a social risk appraisal approach to modelling dynamics.

OGara D, Kasman M, Hebert-Dufresne L, Hammond R J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240363.

PMID: 39809333 PMC: 11732433. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0363.

BharatSim: An agent-based modelling framework for India.

Cherian P, Kshirsagar J, Neekhra B, Deshkar G, Hayatnagarkar H, Kapoor K PLoS Comput Biol. 2025; 20(12):e1012682.

PMID: 39775067 PMC: 11750085. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012682.

References

Cohen-Cole E, Fletcher J . Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: longitudinal analysis. BMJ. 2008; 337:a2533. PMC: 2600605. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a2533. View

Klovdahl A . Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med. 1985; 21(11):1203-16. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90269-2. View

Dimitrov N, Goll S, Hupert N, Pourbohloul B, Meyers L . Optimizing tactics for use of the U.S. antiviral strategic national stockpile for pandemic influenza. PLoS One. 2011; 6(1):e16094. PMC: 3023704. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016094. View

Christakis N, Fowler J . The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(21):2249-58. PMC: 2822344. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0706154. View

Levy D, Bales S, Lam N, Nikolayev L . The role of public policies in reducing smoking and deaths caused by smoking in Vietnam: results from the Vietnam tobacco policy simulation model. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 62(7):1819-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.043. View

Mendez D, Warner K . Smoking prevalence in 2010: why the healthy people goal is unattainable. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90(3):401-3. PMC: 1446175. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.3.401. View

Sterman J . Learning from evidence in a complex world. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(3):505-14. PMC: 1470513. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066043. View

Hirsch G, Homer J, Evans E, Zielinski A . A system dynamics model for planning cardiovascular disease interventions. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(4):616-22. PMC: 2836333. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159434. View

Hammond R . Complex systems modeling for obesity research. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6(3):A97. PMC: 2722404. View

10.

Rothenberg R, Sterk C, Toomey K, Potterat J, Johnson D, Schrader M . Using social network and ethnographic tools to evaluate syphilis transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 1998; 25(3):154-60. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199803000-00009. View

11.

Christley R, Pinchbeck G, Bowers R, Clancy D, French N, Bennett R . Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(10):1024-31. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi308. View

12.

Luke D, Ribisl K, Smith C, Sorg A . Family Smoking Prevention And Tobacco Control Act: banning outdoor tobacco advertising near schools and playgrounds. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(3):295-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.018. View

13.

Epstein J, Parker J, Cummings D, Hammond R . Coupled contagion dynamics of fear and disease: mathematical and computational explorations. PLoS One. 2008; 3(12):e3955. PMC: 2596968. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003955. View

14.

Thompson K, Tebbens R . Eradication versus control for poliomyelitis: an economic analysis. Lancet. 2007; 369(9570):1363-1371. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60532-7. View

15.

Leischow S, Luke D, Mueller N, Harris J, Ponder P, Marcus S . Mapping U.S. government tobacco control leadership: networked for success?. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12(9):888-94. PMC: 2928935. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq112. View

16.

Homer J, Milstein B, Wile K, Pratibhu P, Farris R, Orenstein D . Modeling the local dynamics of cardiovascular health: risk factors, context, and capacity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5(2):A63. PMC: 2396963. View

17.

Axtell R, Epstein J, Dean J, Gumerman G, Swedlund A, Harburger J . Population growth and collapse in a multiagent model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99 Suppl 3:7275-9. PMC: 128597. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092080799. View

18.

Graham J, Hansen W . Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: a comparison of group members and group outsiders. J Appl Psychol. 1994; 79(2):281-7. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.281. View

19.

Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D . A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(4):309-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0020761. View

20.

Harris J, Luke D, Burke R, Mueller N . Seeing the forest and the trees: using network analysis to develop an organizational blueprint of state tobacco control systems. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(11):1669-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.013. View