» Articles » PMID: 22222428

Expression and Regulation of RAD51 Mediate Cellular Responses to Chemotherapeutics

Overview
Date 2012 Jan 7
PMID 22222428
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is evidence that RAD51 expression associates with resistance to commonly used chemotherapeutics. Our previous work demonstrated that inhibitors of thymidylate synthase (TS) induced RAD51-dependent homologous recombination (HR), and depleting the RAD51 recombinase sensitized cells to TS inhibitors. In this study, the consequences of RAD51 over-expression were studied. Over-expression of wild-type RAD51 (∼6-fold above endogenous RAD51) conferred resistance to TS inhibitors. In contrast, over-expression of a mutant RAD51 (T309A) that is incapable of being phosphorylated rendered cells more chemosensitive. Moreover, over-expression of the T309A mutant acted in a dominant negative manner over endogenous RAD51 by causing the reduced localization of RAD51 foci following treatment with TS inhibitors. To measure the effect of mutant RAD51 on the cellular response to other DNA damaging chemotherapeutics, the topoisomerase poison etoposide was utilized. Cells over-expressing wild-type RAD51 showed reduced DNA strand breaks, while cells over-expressing the mutant RAD51 showed more than twice as many strand breaks, suggesting that the mutant RAD51 was actively inhibiting strand break resolution. To directly demonstrate an effect on HR, wild-type RAD51 and T309A mutant RAD51 were transiently expressed in HeLa cells that contained an HR reporter construct. HR events provoked by DNA breaks induced by the I-SceI endonuclease increased in cells expressing wild-type RAD51 and decreased in cells expressing the T309A mutant. Collectively, the data suggest that interference with the activation of RAD51-mediated HR represents a potentially useful anticancer target for combination therapies.

Citing Articles

RAD51 is a poor prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Tsai Y, Chan L, Chen Y, Su C, Hsu C, Wang Y Cancer Cell Int. 2023; 23(1):231.

PMID: 37798649 PMC: 10552296. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-023-03071-w.


Enhancing the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to olaparib via microRNA-20b-mediated cyclin D1 targeting.

Zhong Q, Xiong Y, Ling C, Qian Y, Zhao X, Yang H Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021; 246(11):1297-1306.

PMID: 34092127 PMC: 8371305. DOI: 10.1177/1535370221994077.


Metformin overcomes resistance to cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells by targeting RAD51.

Lee J, Kang M, Byun W, Kim S, Seo I, Han J Breast Cancer Res. 2019; 21(1):115.

PMID: 31640742 PMC: 6805313. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1204-2.


Phase I trial of selenium plus chemotherapy in gynecologic cancers.

Song M, Kumaran M, Gounder M, Gibbon D, Nieves-Neira W, Vaidya A Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 150(3):478-486.

PMID: 30068487 PMC: 6154492. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.001.


miR-98-5p contributes to cisplatin resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer by suppressing miR-152 biogenesis via targeting Dicer1.

Wang Y, Bao W, Liu Y, Wang S, Xu S, Li X Cell Death Dis. 2018; 9(5):447.

PMID: 29670086 PMC: 5906447. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0390-7.


References
1.
Binz S, Sheehan A, Wold M . Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004; 3(8-9):1015-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.028. View

2.
Wilsker D, Bunz F . Loss of ataxia telangiectasia mutated- and Rad3-related function potentiates the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on cancer cell survival. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007; 6(4):1406-13. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0679. View

3.
Huang F, Motlekar N, Burgwin C, Napper A, Diamond S, Mazin A . Identification of specific inhibitors of human RAD51 recombinase using high-throughput screening. ACS Chem Biol. 2011; 6(6):628-35. PMC: 3117970. DOI: 10.1021/cb100428c. View

4.
Bryant H, Schultz N, Thomas H, Parker K, Flower D, Lopez E . Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005; 434(7035):913-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature03443. View

5.
Berger S, Pittman D, Wyatt M . Uracil in DNA: consequences for carcinogenesis and chemotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008; 76(6):697-706. PMC: 2562027. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.05.019. View