» Articles » PMID: 22216092

Restricting Microbial Exposure in Early Life Negates the Immune Benefits Associated with Gut Colonization in Environments of High Microbial Diversity

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jan 5
PMID 22216092
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Acquisition of the intestinal microbiota in early life corresponds with the development of the mucosal immune system. Recent work on caesarean-delivered infants revealed that early microbial composition is influenced by birthing method and environment. Furthermore, we have confirmed that early-life environment strongly influences both the adult gut microbiota and development of the gut immune system. Here, we address the impact of limiting microbial exposure after initial colonization on the development of adult gut immunity.

Methodology/principal Findings: Piglets were born in indoor or outdoor rearing units, allowing natural colonization in the immediate period after birth, prior to transfer to high-health status isolators. Strikingly, gut closure and morphological development were strongly affected by isolator-rearing, independent of indoor or outdoor origins of piglets. Isolator-reared animals showed extensive vacuolation and disorganization of the gut epithelium, inferring that normal gut closure requires maturation factors present in maternal milk. Although morphological maturation and gut closure were delayed in isolator-reared animals, these hard-wired events occurred later in development. Type I IFN, IL-22, IL-23 and Th17 pathways were increased in indoor-isolator compared to outdoor-isolator animals during early life, indicating greater immune activation in pigs originating from indoor environments reflecting differences in the early microbiota. This difference was less apparent later in development due to enhanced immune activation and convergence of the microbiota in all isolator-reared animals. This correlated with elevation of Type I IFN pathways in both groups, although T cell pathways were still more affected in indoor-reared animals.

Conclusions/significance: Environmental factors, in particular microbial exposure, influence expression of a large number of immune-related genes. However, the homeostatic effects of microbial colonization in outdoor environments require sustained microbial exposure throughout development. Gut development in high-hygiene environments negatively impacts on normal succession of the gut microbiota and promotes innate immune activation which may impair immune homeostasis.

Citing Articles

Neonatal and maternal dietary interventions driving microbiota and functionality in piglet gut compartments.

Schokker D, van den Esker M, Bossers A, Allaart J, van Hees H, de Greeff A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6771.

PMID: 40000703 PMC: 11861315. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90781-y.


A concept for international societally relevant microbiology education and microbiology knowledge promulgation in society.

Timmis K, Hallsworth J, McGenity T, Armstrong R, Colom M, Karahan Z Microb Biotechnol. 2024; 17(5):e14456.

PMID: 38801001 PMC: 11129164. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.14456.


Effects of dietary xylanase supplementation on growth performance, intestinal health, and immune response of nursery pigs fed diets with reduced metabolizable energy.

Baker J, Duarte M, Kim S J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 38280204 PMC: 10889732. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae026.


Integrating Omics Technologies for a Comprehensive Understanding of the Microbiome and Its Impact on Cattle Production.

Kaur H, Kaur G, Gupta T, Mittal D, Ali S Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37759599 PMC: 10525894. DOI: 10.3390/biology12091200.


Multi-omics analyses reveal that the gut microbiome and its metabolites promote milk fat synthesis in Zhongdian yak cows.

Liu L, Wu P, Chen F, Zhou J, Guo A, Shi K PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14444.

PMID: 36518262 PMC: 9744170. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14444.


References
1.
Macpherson A, Harris N . Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004; 4(6):478-85. DOI: 10.1038/nri1373. View

2.
Kuno K, Kanada N, Nakashima E, Fujiki F, ICHIMURA F, Matsushima K . Molecular cloning of a gene encoding a new type of metalloproteinase-disintegrin family protein with thrombospondin motifs as an inflammation associated gene. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272(1):556-62. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.1.556. View

3.
Backhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper L, Koh G, Nagy A . The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(44):15718-23. PMC: 524219. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407076101. View

4.
Palmer C, Bik E, DiGiulio D, Relman D, Brown P . Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(7):e177. PMC: 1896187. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050177. View

5.
Wen L, Ley R, Volchkov P, Stranges P, Avanesyan L, Stonebraker A . Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes. Nature. 2008; 455(7216):1109-13. PMC: 2574766. DOI: 10.1038/nature07336. View