» Articles » PMID: 22211406

Pneumatic Dilation for Achalasia Cardia: Reduction in Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure in Assessing Response and Factors Associated with Recurrence During Long-term Follow Up

Overview
Journal Dig Endosc
Date 2012 Jan 4
PMID 22211406
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Data on utility of post-pneumatic dilation (PD) lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure measurement in evaluating short and long-term efficacy of dilation, which tears the non-relaxing LES in achalasia, are scanty.

Methods: Post-PD LES pressure was measured in 72/98 patients with achalasia. The best cut-off pressure classifying responders and non-responders was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Factors associated with non-response and recurrence were evaluated.

Results: Of 98 patients (41.1 ± 13.3 years, 58 male), 75 improved, three had perforation requiring surgery, and 20 did not respond to the first PD session. Of 18/20 patients undergoing a second PD, 11 improved and six non-responders needed myotomy. 37/58 (71%) male and 17/40 (42.5%) female patients had a first PD with a 35-mm balloon (P = 0.03). Age and gender of patients did not influence outcome. LES pressure was lower in responders or in those having recurrence than in non-responders (17 mmHg [6.4-75], 11 mmHg [4.6-31]vs 25 mmHg [13-55]). On the ROC curve, 22.5 mmHg was the best cut-off value differentiating responders and non-responders (area under curve [AUC] 0.73). Of the 86 patients responding to PD, 20 had recurrence. Patients who responded to one session of PD or had LES pressure <10 mmHg after the procedure recurred less often, although there was no relationship with age and gender.

Conclusion: Post-PD LES pressure measurement is useful to assess treatment response. Patients responding to the first session and those with post-PD LES pressure <10 mmHg tended to recur less. Age and gender did not influence outcome, which might be related to preferential use of a 35-mm balloon, particularly for male patients, during the first session.

Citing Articles

True peristaltic recovery is uncommon following treatment, particularly endoscopic dilation for achalasia cardia, though pseudo-recovery often occurs.

Kulkarni A, Ghoshal U, Shirol V, Elhence A, Fatima B, Agrahari A Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023; 42(4):549-557.

PMID: 37306890 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01372-6.


Correlation between Lower Esophageal Sphincter Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and the Clinical Presentation of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Achalasia.

Cohen D, Avivi E, Bermont A, Shibli F, Azzam N, Hijazi B Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 36980444 PMC: 10047697. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061136.


Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) Distinguishes between Reflux-Predominant and Dysphagia-Predominant Phenotypes of Esophageal "Absent Contractility".

Cohen D, Bermont A, Richter V, Azzam N, Shirin H, Dickman R J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36362515 PMC: 9655163. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216287.


Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up.

Ofosu A, Mohan B, Ichkhanian Y, Masadeh M, Febin J, Barakat M Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9(7):E1097-E1107.

PMID: 34222636 PMC: 8216779. DOI: 10.1055/a-1483-9406.


Retrospective study on symptoms and treatment modalities used and short-term follow up of achalasia cardia in Indian setting.

Jain M, Baijal N, Srinivas M, Baijal R, Pratap N, Bachkaniwala V JGH Open. 2020; 4(5):856-859.

PMID: 33102755 PMC: 7578270. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12328.