» Articles » PMID: 22205031

Population Dynamics of Naive and Memory CD8 T Cell Responses After Antigen Stimulations in Vivo

Overview
Journal J Immunol
Date 2011 Dec 30
PMID 22205031
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The extent to which the progeny of one primary memory CD8 T cell differs from the progeny of one naive CD8 T cell of the same specificity remains an unresolved question. To explore cell-autonomous functional differences between naive and memory CD8 T cells that are not influenced by differences in the priming environment, an experimental model has been developed in which physiological numbers of both populations of cells were cotransferred into naive hosts before Ag stimulation. Interestingly, naive CD8 T cells undergo greater expansion in numbers than do primary memory CD8 T cells after various infections or immunizations. The intrinsic ability of one naive CD8 T cell to give rise to more effector CD8 T cells than one memory CD8 T cell is independent of the number and quality of primary memory CD8 T cells present in vivo. The sustained proliferation of newly activated naive CD8 T cells contributed to their greater magnitude of expansion. Additionally, longitudinal analyses of primary and secondary CD8 T cell responses revealed that on a per-cell basis naive CD8 T cells generate higher numbers of long-lived memory cells than do primary memory CD8 T cells. This enhanced "memory generation potential" of responding naive CD8 T cells occurred despite the delayed contraction of secondary CD8 T cell responses. Taken together, the data in this study revealed previously unappreciated differences between naive and memory CD8 T cells and will help further define the functional potential for both cell types.

Citing Articles

Dietary Restriction Enhances CD8 T Cell Ketolysis to Limit Exhaustion and Boost Anti-Tumor Immunity.

Oswald B, DeCamp L, Longo J, Dahabieh M, Bunda N, Ma S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39605550 PMC: 11601469. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.14.621733.


CD115 monocytes protect microbially experienced mice against -induced sepsis.

Martin M, Skon-Hegg C, Kim C, Xu J, Kucaba T, Swanson W Cell Rep. 2023; 42(11).

PMID: 38111515 PMC: 10727454. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113345.


Survival and division fate programs are preserved but retuned during the naïve to memory CD8 T-cell transition.

Heinzel S, Cheon H, Belz G, Hodgkin P Immunol Cell Biol. 2023; 102(1):46-57.

PMID: 37840018 PMC: 10952575. DOI: 10.1111/imcb.12699.


Ketolysis drives CD8 T cell effector function through effects on histone acetylation.

Luda K, Longo J, Kitchen-Goosen S, Duimstra L, Ma E, Watson M Immunity. 2023; 56(9):2021-2035.e8.

PMID: 37516105 PMC: 10528215. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.07.002.


Longitudinal Characterization of the Mumps-Specific HLA-A2 Restricted T-Cell Response after Mumps Virus Infection.

Lanfermeijer J, Nuhn M, Emmelot M, Poelen M, van Els C, Borghans J Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(12).

PMID: 34960178 PMC: 8707000. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9121431.


References
1.
Zarozinski C, Welsh R . Minimal bystander activation of CD8 T cells during the virus-induced polyclonal T cell response. J Exp Med. 1997; 185(9):1629-39. PMC: 2196303. DOI: 10.1084/jem.185.9.1629. View

2.
Busch D, Pilip I, Vijh S, Pamer E . Coordinate regulation of complex T cell populations responding to bacterial infection. Immunity. 1998; 8(3):353-62. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80540-3. View

3.
Badovinac V, Haring J, Harty J . Initial T cell receptor transgenic cell precursor frequency dictates critical aspects of the CD8(+) T cell response to infection. Immunity. 2007; 26(6):827-41. PMC: 1989155. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.013. View

4.
Wirth T, Xue H, Rai D, Sabel J, Bair T, Harty J . Repetitive antigen stimulation induces stepwise transcriptome diversification but preserves a core signature of memory CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Immunity. 2010; 33(1):128-40. PMC: 2912220. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.06.014. View

5.
Jabbari A, Harty J . Secondary memory CD8+ T cells are more protective but slower to acquire a central-memory phenotype. J Exp Med. 2006; 203(4):919-32. PMC: 2118270. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20052237. View