» Articles » PMID: 22203767

Summary Report on the Graded Prognostic Assessment: an Accurate and Facile Diagnosis-specific Tool to Estimate Survival for Patients with Brain Metastases

Abstract

Purpose: Our group has previously published the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), a prognostic index for patients with brain metastases. Updates have been published with refinements to create diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment indices. The purpose of this report is to present the updated diagnosis-specific GPA indices in a single, unified, user-friendly report to allow ease of access and use by treating physicians.

Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective (1985 to 2007) database of 3,940 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with outcomes by primary site and treatment. Significant prognostic factors were used to define the diagnosis-specific GPA prognostic indices. A GPA of 4.0 correlates with the best prognosis, whereas a GPA of 0.0 corresponds with the worst prognosis.

Results: Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis. For lung cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score, age, presence of extracranial metastases, and number of brain metastases, confirming the original Lung-GPA. For melanoma and renal cell cancer, prognostic factors were Karnofsky performance score and the number of brain metastases. For breast cancer, prognostic factors were tumor subtype, Karnofsky performance score, and age. For GI cancer, the only prognostic factor was the Karnofsky performance score. The median survival times by GPA score and diagnosis were determined.

Conclusion: Prognostic factors for patients with brain metastases vary by diagnosis, and for each diagnosis, a robust separation into different GPA scores was discerned, implying considerable heterogeneity in outcome, even within a single tumor type. In summary, these indices and related worksheet provide an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival, potentially select appropriate treatment, and stratify clinical trials for patients with brain metastases.

Citing Articles

Reirradiation using helical tomotherapy-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for 19 brain metastases after the second recurrence of distant brain failure: a case report and literature review.

Wang T, Zhao H, Suwinski R, Cheng G, Guan W Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025; 14(1):272-286.

PMID: 39958210 PMC: 11826268. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-2024-1151.


Neurosurgical management of brain metastases in the elderly: a prospective study on adverse event prevalence and predictors.

Lenga P, Scherer M, Kleineidam H, Unterberg A, Krieg S, Dao Trong P Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):239.

PMID: 39954148 PMC: 11829898. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03338-y.


A hybrid [F]fluoropivalate PET-multiparametric MRI to detect and characterise brain tumour metastases based on a permissive environment for monocarboxylate transport.

Islam S, Inglese M, Aravind P, Barwick T, Mauri F, McLeavy L Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 39915301 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07118-0.


Prognostic Factors in Therapy Regimes of Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis.

Curtaz C, Harms J, Schmitt C, Sauer S, Christner S, Kessler A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858042 PMC: 11763549. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020261.


Outcomes of Brain Metastasis from Lung Cancer.

Mobley J, Phillips K, Chen Q, Reusch E, Reddy N, Magsam J Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858037 PMC: 11764313. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020256.


References
1.
Zimm S, WAMPLER G, Stablein D, Hazra T, Young H . Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: natural history and results of treatment. Cancer. 1981; 48(2):384-94. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810715)48:2<384::aid-cncr2820480227>3.0.co;2-8. View

2.
Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, Asbell S, Phillips T, Wasserman T . Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 37(4):745-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00619-0. View

3.
Sperduto C, Watanabe Y, Mullan J, Hood T, Dyste G, Watts C . A validation study of a new prognostic index for patients with brain metastases: the Graded Prognostic Assessment. J Neurosurg. 2009; 109 Suppl:87-9. DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S14. View

4.
Murray K, Scott C, Greenberg H, Emami B, Seider M, Vora N . A randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus standard in patients with unresected brain metastases: a report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9104. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 39(3):571-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00341-6. View

5.
Gaspar L, Scott C, Murray K, Curran W . Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47(4):1001-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00547-2. View