» Articles » PMID: 22201175

Establishment of New Mutations Under Divergence and Genome Hitchhiking

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Dec 28
PMID 22201175
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Theoretical models addressing genome-wide patterns of divergence during speciation are needed to help us understand the evolutionary processes generating empirical patterns. Here, we examine a critical issue concerning speciation-with-gene flow: to what degree does physical linkage (r < 0.5) of new mutations to already diverged genes aid the build-up of genomic islands of differentiation? We used simulation and analytical approaches to partition the probability of establishment for a new divergently selected mutation when the mutation (i) is the first to arise in an undifferentiated genome (the direct effect of selection), (ii) arises unlinked to any selected loci (r = 0.5), but within a genome that has some already diverged genes (the effect of genome-wide reductions in gene flow for facilitating divergence, which we term 'genome hitchhiking'), and (iii) arises in physical linkage to a diverged locus (divergence hitchhiking). We find that the strength of selection acting directly on a new mutation is generally the most important predictor for establishment, with divergence and genomic hitchhiking having smaller effects. We outline the specific conditions under which divergence and genome hitchhiking can aid mutation establishment. The results generate predictions about genome divergence at different points in the speciation process and avenues for further work.

Citing Articles

Complex and Dynamic Gene-by-Age and Gene-by-Environment Interactions Underlie Functional Morphological Variation in Adaptive Divergence in Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus).

Ouellet-Fagg C, Easton A, Parsons K, Danzmann R, Ferguson M Evol Dev. 2024; 27(1):e70000.

PMID: 39723482 PMC: 11670044. DOI: 10.1111/ede.70000.


Inversions contribute disproportionately to parallel genomic divergence in dune sunflowers.

Huang K, Ostevik K, Jahani M, Todesco M, Bercovich N, Andrew R Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 9(2):325-335.

PMID: 39633041 PMC: 11807836. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02593-4.


The Genome Architecture of the Copepod Eurytemora carolleeae - the Highly Invasive Atlantic Clade of the Eurytemoraaffinis Species Complex.

Du Z, Gelembiuk G, Moss W, Tritt A, Lee C Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2024; 22(5.

PMID: 39331643 PMC: 11706791. DOI: 10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae066.


Comparative Genomics Supports Ecologically Induced Selection as a Putative Driver of Banded Penguin Diversification.

Leon F, Pizarro E, Noll D, Pertierra L, Parker P, Espinaze M Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39150953 PMC: 11371425. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae166.


Two host-plant strains in the fall armyworm.

Nam K, Negre N, Saldamando Benjumea C Insect Sci. 2024; 31(6):1675-1683.

PMID: 38437152 PMC: 11632296. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13346.


References
1.
Orr H . The genetic basis of reproductive isolation: insights from Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102 Suppl 1:6522-6. PMC: 1131866. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501893102. View

2.
Thibert-Plante X, Hendry A . Five questions on ecological speciation addressed with individual-based simulations. J Evol Biol. 2009; 22(1):109-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01627.x. View

3.
Feder J, Berlocher S, Roethele J, Dambroski H, Smith J, Perry W . Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(18):10314-9. PMC: 193558. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1730757100. View

4.
Yeaman S, Whitlock M . The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration-selection balance. Evolution. 2011; 65(7):1897-911. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01269.x. View

5.
Smith T, Calsbeek R, Wayne R, Holder K, Pires D, Bardeleben C . Testing alternative mechanisms of evolutionary divergence in an African rain forest passerine bird. J Evol Biol. 2005; 18(2):257-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00825.x. View