» Articles » PMID: 22196405

Risk Factors and Quality of Life for Post-prostatectomy Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenoses

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2011 Dec 27
PMID 22196405
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the difference in vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) rates after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) vs robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and to analyze associated factors and effect on quality of life.

Methods: From 2001 to 2009, a total of 1038 patients underwent RARP and 707 patients underwent open RRP. Perioperative factors and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) quality of life scores were compared between patients who did and did not develop a VUAS. Independent significant predictors of VUAS development were identified using multivariable modeling.

Results: The incidence of VUAS in open RRP cases was higher (53/707, 7.5%) than for RARP (22/1038, 2.1%) (P<.0001). Intervention consisted of dilation in 34 of 75 cases (45.3%), internal urethrotomy in 8 of 75 (10.7%), and multiple procedures in 30 of 75 (40%). Open technique (P<.0001, odds ratio [OR]=3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.8-5.2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence (P=.02, OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.2-4.1), postoperative hematuria (P=.02, OR=3.7, 95% CI=1.2-11.3), urinary leak (P=.002, OR=6.0, 95% CI=1.9-19.2), and urinary retention (P=.004, OR=3.5, 95% CI=1.5-8.7) were significant independent predictors of VUAS development. EPIC incontinence scores were similar between VUAS and non-VUAS patients, whereas irritative voiding scores were worse initially with VUAS but became similar by 12 months.

Conclusion: There is a higher rate of VUAS after open RRP vs RARP. Most cases of VUAS require endoscopic intervention. Predictors include open surgery, PSA recurrence, and postoperative hematuria, urinary leak, and retention. There is no diminution of quality of life scores at 12 months.

Citing Articles

The effect of proliferative hypertrophic scars on determining treatment options for preventing recurrence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cross-sectional study.

Selvi I, Arik A, Basay M, Basar H Sao Paulo Med J. 2021; 139(3):241-250.

PMID: 33909829 PMC: 9625006. DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0349.R1.28012021.


Bladder Neck Resection Combined with Ten Point Intralesional Mitomycin C Injection in Management of Refractory Bladder Neck Contracture in Post TURP Status: A Single-Center, 2-Year Experience.

Selvaraj N, Thangarasu M, Jayaprakash S, Raghavan D, Paul R Res Rep Urol. 2020; 12:433-438.

PMID: 33062622 PMC: 7524189. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S267561.


Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kostakis I, Sran H, Uwechue R, Chandak P, Olsburgh J, Mamode N Robot Surg. 2020; 6:27-40.

PMID: 31921934 PMC: 6934120. DOI: 10.2147/RSRR.S186768.


[Stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy].

Beck V, Apfelbeck M, Chaloupka M, Kretschmer A, Strittmatter F, Tritschler S Urologe A. 2017; 57(1):29-33.

PMID: 29209754 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0550-x.


Interrupted versus continuous suturing for vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kowalewski K, Tapking C, Hetjens S, Nickel F, Mandel P, Ritter M BMJ Open. 2017; 7(11):e019823.

PMID: 29175892 PMC: 5719287. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019823.