Objective:
To evaluate the difference in vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) rates after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) vs robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and to analyze associated factors and effect on quality of life.
Methods:
From 2001 to 2009, a total of 1038 patients underwent RARP and 707 patients underwent open RRP. Perioperative factors and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) quality of life scores were compared between patients who did and did not develop a VUAS. Independent significant predictors of VUAS development were identified using multivariable modeling.
Results:
The incidence of VUAS in open RRP cases was higher (53/707, 7.5%) than for RARP (22/1038, 2.1%) (P<.0001). Intervention consisted of dilation in 34 of 75 cases (45.3%), internal urethrotomy in 8 of 75 (10.7%), and multiple procedures in 30 of 75 (40%). Open technique (P<.0001, odds ratio [OR]=3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.8-5.2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence (P=.02, OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.2-4.1), postoperative hematuria (P=.02, OR=3.7, 95% CI=1.2-11.3), urinary leak (P=.002, OR=6.0, 95% CI=1.9-19.2), and urinary retention (P=.004, OR=3.5, 95% CI=1.5-8.7) were significant independent predictors of VUAS development. EPIC incontinence scores were similar between VUAS and non-VUAS patients, whereas irritative voiding scores were worse initially with VUAS but became similar by 12 months.
Conclusion:
There is a higher rate of VUAS after open RRP vs RARP. Most cases of VUAS require endoscopic intervention. Predictors include open surgery, PSA recurrence, and postoperative hematuria, urinary leak, and retention. There is no diminution of quality of life scores at 12 months.
Citing Articles
The effect of proliferative hypertrophic scars on determining treatment options for preventing recurrence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cross-sectional study.
Selvi I, Arik A, Basay M, Basar H
Sao Paulo Med J. 2021; 139(3):241-250.
PMID: 33909829
PMC: 9625006.
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0349.R1.28012021.
Bladder Neck Resection Combined with Ten Point Intralesional Mitomycin C Injection in Management of Refractory Bladder Neck Contracture in Post TURP Status: A Single-Center, 2-Year Experience.
Selvaraj N, Thangarasu M, Jayaprakash S, Raghavan D, Paul R
Res Rep Urol. 2020; 12:433-438.
PMID: 33062622
PMC: 7524189.
DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S267561.
Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kostakis I, Sran H, Uwechue R, Chandak P, Olsburgh J, Mamode N
Robot Surg. 2020; 6:27-40.
PMID: 31921934
PMC: 6934120.
DOI: 10.2147/RSRR.S186768.
[Stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy].
Beck V, Apfelbeck M, Chaloupka M, Kretschmer A, Strittmatter F, Tritschler S
Urologe A. 2017; 57(1):29-33.
PMID: 29209754
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0550-x.
Interrupted versus continuous suturing for vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kowalewski K, Tapking C, Hetjens S, Nickel F, Mandel P, Ritter M
BMJ Open. 2017; 7(11):e019823.
PMID: 29175892
PMC: 5719287.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019823.
Differences in Recurrence Rate and Incontinence after Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicourethral Stenosis and Bladder Neck Stenosis.
Kranz J, Reiss P, Salomon G, Steffens J, Fisch M, Rosenbaum C
Front Surg. 2017; 4:44.
PMID: 28848735
PMC: 5554361.
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00044.
Long-term adverse effects after retropubic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Nationwide, population-based study.
Fridriksson J, Folkvaljon Y, Lundstrom K, Robinson D, Carlsson S, Stattin P
J Surg Oncol. 2017; 116(4):500-506.
PMID: 28591934
PMC: 5600093.
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24687.
Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Seo H, Lee N, Son S, Kim D, Rha K, Lee S
Yonsei Med J. 2016; 57(5):1165-77.
PMID: 27401648
PMC: 4960383.
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1165.
Bladder neck contracture.
Simhan J, Ramirez D, Hudak S, Morey A
Transl Androl Urol. 2016; 3(2):214-20.
PMID: 26816768
PMC: 4708160.
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.04.09.
Epidemiology of urethral strictures.
Alwaal A, Blaschko S, McAninch J, Breyer B
Transl Androl Urol. 2016; 3(2):209-13.
PMID: 26813256
PMC: 4708169.
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.04.07.
Optimizing the formation of vesicourethral anastomosis and reduction of procedure time. A two-year experience with a modified technique for endoscopic running vesicourethral anastomosis.
Golabek T, Wiatr T, Przydacz M, Bukowczan J, Dudek P, Sobczynski R
Cent European J Urol. 2015; 68(3):296-301.
PMID: 26568869
PMC: 4643710.
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2015.617.
A new technique of bladder neck reconstruction during radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.
Tolkach Y, Godin K, Petrov S, Schelin S, Imkamp F
Int Braz J Urol. 2015; 41(3):455-65.
PMID: 26200563
PMC: 4752138.
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0341.
Intralesional injection of mitomycin C at transurethral incision of bladder neck contracture may offer limited benefit: TURNS Study Group.
Redshaw J, Broghammer J, Smith 3rd T, Voelzke B, Erickson B, McClung C
J Urol. 2014; 193(2):587-92.
PMID: 25200807
PMC: 4307389.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.104.
Development and characterization of an antibody-labeled super-paramagnetic iron oxide contrast agent targeting prostate cancer cells for magnetic resonance imaging.
Bates D, Abraham S, Campbell M, Zehbe I, Curiel L
PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e97220.
PMID: 24819929
PMC: 4018298.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097220.
Current trends in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
Kim J, Cho K
Korean J Urol. 2012; 53(8):511-8.
PMID: 22949993
PMC: 3427833.
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.511.