» Articles » PMID: 22194992

Predator Dispersal Determines the Effect of Connectivity on Prey Diversity

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Dec 24
PMID 22194992
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Linking local communities to a metacommunity can positively affect diversity by enabling immigration of dispersal-limited species and maintenance of sink populations. However, connectivity can also negatively affect diversity by allowing the spread of strong competitors or predators. In a microcosm experiment with five ciliate species as prey and a copepod as an efficient generalist predator, we analysed the effect of connectivity on prey species richness in metacommunities that were either unconnected, connected for the prey, or connected for both prey and predator. Presence and absence of predator dispersal was cross-classified with low and high connectivity. The effect of connectivity on local and regional richness strongly depended on whether corridors were open for the predator. Local richness was initially positively affected by connectivity through rescue of species from stochastic extinctions. With predator dispersal, however, this positive effect soon turned negative as the predator spread over the metacommunity. Regional richness was unaffected by connectivity when local communities were connected only for the prey, while predator dispersal resulted in a pronounced decrease of regional richness. The level of connectivity influenced the speed of richness decline, with regional species extinctions being delayed for one week in weakly connected metacommunities. While connectivity enabled rescue of prey species from stochastic extinctions, deterministic extinctions due to predation were not overcome through reimmigration from predator-free refuges. Prey reimmigrating into these sink habitats appeared to be directly converted into increased predator abundance. Connectivity thus had a positive effect on the predator, even when the predator was not dispersing itself. Our study illustrates that dispersal of a species with strong negative effects on other community members shapes the dispersal-diversity relationship. When connections enable the spread of a generalist predator, positive effects of connectivity on prey species richness are outweighed by regional extinctions through predation.

Citing Articles

Landscape configuration affects probability of apex predator presence and community structure in experimental metacommunities.

Wolfe E, Hammill E, Memmott J, Clements C Oecologia. 2022; 199(1):193-204.

PMID: 35523981 PMC: 9120115. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05178-9.


Does spatiotemporal nutrient variation allow more species to coexist?.

Di Carvalho J, Wickham S Oecologia. 2020; 194(4):695-707.

PMID: 33099656 PMC: 7683490. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04768-9.


Simulating eutrophication in a metacommunity landscape: an aquatic model ecosystem.

Di Carvalho J, Wickham S Oecologia. 2018; 189(2):461-474.

PMID: 30523402 PMC: 6394664. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-018-4319-8.


Habitat connectivity and resident shared predators determine the impact of invasive bullfrogs on native frogs in farm ponds.

Atobe T, Osada Y, Takeda H, Kuroe M, Miyashita T Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1786).

PMID: 24827433 PMC: 4046391. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2621.


Transitory versus persistent effects of connectivity in environmentally homogeneous metacommunities.

Limberger R, Wickham S PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e44555.

PMID: 22952993 PMC: 3431365. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044555.

References
1.
Howeth J, Leibold M . Species dispersal rates alter diversity and ecosystem stability in pond metacommunities. Ecology. 2010; 91(9):2727-41. DOI: 10.1890/09-1004.1. View

2.
Dumont H, Van de Velde I, Dumont S . The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia. 2017; 19(1):75-97. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377592. View

3.
Kneitel J, Miller T . Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Am Nat. 2003; 162(2):165-71. DOI: 10.1086/376585. View

4.
Cadotte M, Fortner A, Fukami T . The effects of resource enrichment, dispersal, and predation on local and metacommunity structure. Oecologia. 2006; 149(1):150-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0426-z. View

5.
Warren P . The effects of between-habitat dispersal rate on protist communities and metacommunities in microcosms at two spatial scales. Oecologia. 2017; 105(1):132-140. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328801. View