» Articles » PMID: 22189711

Bone Marrow- and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Differences and Similarities

Overview
Journal Cell Cycle
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2011 Dec 23
PMID 22189711
Citations 83
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (Ad) are both considered being prospective sources of MSC for therapeutic applications. However, functional properties and therapeutic efficacy of MSC derived from different tissues of the same patient are still poorly investigated. In our study, BM-MSC and F-MSC cultures from 43 adult donors were evaluated in successive passages for immunophenotype, secretion of VEGF, SDF1, MCP1, IL6 and TGFβ1, frequency of colony-forming units (CFU-F), frequency of adipo- and osteo-progenitors (CFU-Ad, CFU-Ost), and for onset of in vitro replicative senescence. We have demonstrated that at early passages (P2-P4 or up to 14-15 in vitro population doublings) BM- and Ad- derived MSC cultures are comparable in such important characteristics as proliferation rate (population doubling time: 3.4±0.2% in BM-MSC, 3±0.3% in F-MSC), clonogenity (CFU-F frequency: 32±5% in BM-MSC, 31±5% in F-MSC), differentiation potential (CFU-Ad frequency: 10.4±2% in BM-MSC, 13±3% in F-MSC; CFU-Ost frequency: 18.5±5.5% in BM-MSC, 18±5% in F-MSC), but differ significantly in abundance of CD146⁺ fraction within the sample (25±5% in BM-MSC, 7±3% in F-MSC) and in a level of VEGF, SDF-1, MCP1 and TGFβ1 secretion. We have also demonstrated that BM-MSC enter senescence after P3-4 while most of F-MSC did not show senescence features up to P6-8. Together, these data demonstrate that specific properties of MSC from different sources should be always taken into account, when developing and optimizing the specific protocols for MSC expansion and evaluation for each particular clinical application.

Citing Articles

High paracrine activity of hADSCs cartilage microtissues inhibits extracellular matrix degradation and promotes cartilage regeneration.

Liu W, Jiang H, Chen J, Tian Y, He Y, Jiao Y Mater Today Bio. 2025; 30():101372.

PMID: 39839494 PMC: 11745967. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101372.


Fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells in skeletal muscle unloading: metabolic and functional impairments.

Sorokina M, Bobkov D, Khromova N, Vilchinskaya N, Shenkman B, Kostareva A Skelet Muscle. 2024; 14(1):31.

PMID: 39639402 PMC: 11622572. DOI: 10.1186/s13395-024-00362-2.


The Effect of Cell Culture Passage on the Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as a Cell Therapy Treatment.

Carmona-Luque M, Ballesteros-Ribelles A, Millan-Lopez A, Blanco A, Nogueras S, Herrera C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731011 PMC: 11084414. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092480.


Comparison between the Regenerative and Therapeutic Impacts of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Pre-Treated with Melatonin on Liver Fibrosis.

Elzainy A, El Sadik A, Altowayan W Biomolecules. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38540717 PMC: 10968153. DOI: 10.3390/biom14030297.


Optimal temperature for the long-term culture of adult porcine islets for xenotransplantation.

Sakata N, Yoshimatsu G, Kawakami R, Aoyagi C, Kodama S Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1280668.

PMID: 37901206 PMC: 10611499. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1280668.