» Articles » PMID: 22184691

Comparative Effectiveness of Clostridium Difficile Treatments: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Ann Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Dec 21
PMID 22184691
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clostridium difficile infection is increasing in incidence and severity. The optimal treatment is unknown.

Purpose: To determine whether, among adults with C. difficile infection, treatment with certain antibiotics compared with others results in differences in initial cure, recurrence, and harms.

Data Sources: MEDLINE, AMED, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases (search dates: inception through August 2011, limited to English-language reports); bibliography review.

Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials of adults with C. difficile infection, independent of outcomes, who were treated with medications available in the United States. Observational studies reporting strain were included.

Data Extraction: Study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality and strength of evidence as assessed by 2 reviewers, study definitions, and duration of treatment and follow-up. Outcomes included initial cure, recurrence, and treatment harms.

Data Synthesis: 11 trials that included 1463 participants were identified. Three trials compared metronidazole with vancomycin; 8 compared metronidazole or vancomycin with another agent, combined agents, or placebo. Strain was analyzed in 1 trial and 2 cohort studies. No study comparing 2 antimicrobial agents demonstrated a statistically significant difference for initial cure; all comparisons were of low to moderate strength of evidence. Moderate-strength evidence from 1 study demonstrated that recurrence was decreased with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin (15% vs. 25%; difference, -10 percentage points [95% CI, -17 to -3 percentage points]; P=0.005). Subgroup analysis of a single study comparing metronidazole with vancomycin for patients who have severe C. difficile infection showed no difference by intention-to-treat analysis; this was rated as insufficient-strength evidence. Harms, when reported, did not differ between treatments in any study.

Limitations: Definitions of diarrhea, C. difficile infection, initial cure, and relapse varied. Some studies reported insufficient detail to allow assessment of all randomly assigned participants or of harms.

Conclusion: No antimicrobial agent is clearly superior for the initial cure of C. difficile infection. Recurrence is less frequent with fidaxomicin than with vancomycin.

Primary Funding Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Citing Articles

Cell Wall Protein 2 as a Vaccine Candidate Protects Mice Against Infection.

Wang S, Heuler J, Bullock J, Qin J, Chakraborty S, Nathaniel A Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852800 PMC: 11768939. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13010021.


Recombinant Fusion Protein Vaccine Containing Clostridioides difficile FliC and FliD Protects Mice against C. difficile Infection.

Wang S, Ju X, Heuler J, Zhang K, Duan Z, Warnakulasuriya Patabendige H Infect Immun. 2023; 91(4):e0016922.

PMID: 36939332 PMC: 10112125. DOI: 10.1128/iai.00169-22.


Black Seed Oil, Bentonite Clay, and Probiotics: A Comprehensive Holistic Cure for Infection in a 2-Year-Old Female Child.

Littman E, Winningham N, Carson T, Hidalgo I Case Rep Infect Dis. 2022; 2022:2002488.

PMID: 35677311 PMC: 9168092. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2002488.


Impact of Therapy on Nosocomial Acquisition of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci.

Correa-Martinez C, Hagemeier N, Frobose N, Kampmeier S Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14(11).

PMID: 34832848 PMC: 8625989. DOI: 10.3390/ph14111066.


Host immunity modulates the efficacy of microbiota transplantation for treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.

Littmann E, Lee J, Denny J, Alam Z, Maslanka J, Zarin I Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):755.

PMID: 33531483 PMC: 7854624. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20793-x.