» Articles » PMID: 22183071

DNA Repair Genes Polymorphisms in Multiple Myeloma: No Association with XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) Polymorphism, but the XRCC4 (VNTR in Intron 3 and G-1394T) and XPD (Lys751Gln) Polymorphisms is Associated with the Disease in Turkish Patients

Overview
Journal Hematology
Specialty Hematology
Date 2011 Dec 21
PMID 22183071
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between the polymorphisms in DNA repair genes (XPD, XRCC1, and XRCC4) and clinical parameters in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), their effects on prognosis and their roles in susceptibility to MM.

Patients And Methods: Sixty patients, diagnosed with MM and 70 individuals as the healthy control group were included in the study. Gene polymorphisms were detected with the polymerase chain reaction and/or polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. When the genotype frequencies of XPD (Llys751Gln) and XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) genes were examined in the patient and control groups, no significant difference was detected, while a significant association was found in XRCC4 (VNTR in intron 3 and G-1394T) polymorphisms. A significant association was found in the MM patients group for AA genotype and event-free survival (EFS) in terms of XPD (751) gene polymorphism (P = 0.047). When VNTR intron 3 polymorphism was compared for genotype frequency, DD genotype was found to be significantly low (P = 0.012) in the patient group, whereas GG and TT genotypes were found to be significantly lower in the patient group for the genotype frequency XRCC4 (G-1394T) polymorphism when compared to the control group (P = 0.015, P = 0.010, respectively).

Results: These data provide support for the hypothesis that a common variation in the genes encoding XRCC4 DNA repair proteins may contribute to susceptibility to myeloma. These findings require further validation in independent populations.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of inter-individual differences in the DNA repair processes involved in melphalan monoadduct repair in relation to treatment outcomes.

van Kan M, Burns K, Helsby N Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021; 88(5):755-769.

PMID: 34347127 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04340-z.


Absence of XRCC4 and its paralogs in human cells reveal differences in outcomes for DNA repair and V(D)J recombination.

Ruis B, Molan A, Takasugi T, Hendrickson E DNA Repair (Amst). 2019; 85:102738.

PMID: 31731258 PMC: 6952554. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102738.


Development of an Initial Conceptual Model of Multiple Myeloma to Support Clinical and Health Economics Decision Making.

Gonzalez-McQuire S, Dimopoulos M, Weisel K, Bouwmeester W, Hajek R, Campioni M MDM Policy Pract. 2019; 4(1):2381468318814253.

PMID: 30729167 PMC: 6350154. DOI: 10.1177/2381468318814253.


DNA Repair Gene (XPD, XRCC4, and XRCC1) Polymorphisms in Patients with Endometrial Hyperplasia: A Pilot Study.

Ozturk E, Pehlivan S, Balat O, Ugur M, Ozcan H, Erkilic S Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2018; 24:146-150.

PMID: 30275440 PMC: 6178876. DOI: 10.12659/MSMBR.911041.


Susceptibility to Breast Cancer and Intron 3 Ins/Del Genetic Polymorphism of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Gene .

Saadat M, Saadat S J Med Biochem. 2017; 34(4):409-413.

PMID: 28356849 PMC: 4922352. DOI: 10.2478/jomb-2014-0051.